Sunday, October 14, 2018

98 "Knocc, Knocc, Knoccin' On NeveaH's Doe (Heaven's Door)" - Cuzzin Ice Lecta

https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1055059408881938432
Atheist Females Are Typically More Intelligent And More Educated, Hence They're Less Likely To Have Great Reproductive Success Or At Least A Child! Why? because Personality Traits That Lead To Higher Intelligence Correlate With Personality Traits That Lead To Reduced Fitness!
Begin Reading On Page 18.
Romans 8:31; If God is with us who can ever be against us? Thank you JESUS!

https://x.com/epkaufm/status/1604149447730028545
Eric Kaufmann
@epkaufm
300m Amish in America in 2200s if they keep up pace of last 100 for next 200 years
https://x.com/Shiftant/status/1651001178623209473

evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein offers a more reasonable explanation: "belief systems have flourished because they have facilitated the interests of the creatures involved," he says. Religious people are evolutionarily fitter than non-believers, not because they are protected by a deity but rather because religion is a form of adaptive evolution. Religion is so widespread because it has massive survival advantages beneath the supernatural elements—that's what Weinstein refers to as "literally false and metaphorically true". For example, believing in heaven is literally false—there is no such place—but believing in it keeps your descendants in good standing in the religious community after you're gone, thus setting your lineage up to continue. The thought itself may be untrue, but the result of the thought is evolutionarily effective. "Despite the fact that human beings think that they have escaped the evolutionary paradigm, they’ve done nothing of the kind, and so we should expect the belief systems that people hold to mirror the evolutionary interests that people have," Weinstein says.



Congrats to this study helping to explain why religious people have larger families. The study clarifies that religious cooperation extends to childcare. Well done John!Alloparenting and religious fertility: A test of the religious allopar...
 Jan 16
Very interesting and important. So-called New Atheists need to come to grips with the fact that religious groups function well in straight-up biological terms.
Jan 16
Religiosity is partly genetic, combine that with the higher fertility of religious people and it's naive to think religion will die out anytime soon. Oct 24 “Their argument, therefore, is that parental cooperation and alloparenting can overcome the offspring quality vs. quantity tradeoff, and that these characteristics are more prominent in religious communities.” https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-instincts/201904/are-religious-parents-better-parents

 https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1161883823287754752
Rolf Degen
@DegenRolf
Your personality traits affect your chances of getting laid, and of reproducing.
Image
**Intelligence And Traits Such As Neuroticism Go Hand In Hand. So It's Not So Much That Less Educated Females Don't Know The Evolutionary Reasons For Their Behavior As It Is Their Lower Intelligence And Personality Traits Related To Lower Intelligence (Extroversion) That Lead To Them Getting Pregnant And Giving Birth At An Early Age! 

Tyler Cowen quotes from a new study testing the relationship between grades and delayed sexual activity.

Last December I passed a paper along to Razib showing that high-school age adolescents with higher IQs and extremely low IQs were less likely to have had first intercourse than those with average to below average intelligence. (i.e. for males with IQs under 70, 63.3% were still virgins, for those with IQs between 70-90 only 50.2% were virgin, 58.6% were virgins with IQs between 90-110, and 70.3% with IQs over 110 were virgins)

In fact, a more detailed study from 2000 is devoted strictly to this topic, and finds the same thing: Smart Teens Don't Have Sex (or Kiss Much Either).

https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1772647509329846439
Rolf Degen
@DegenRolf
Women from the lower social classes start their reproductive careers exactly half a decade earlier than their better-off counterparts, which is necessary to match their reproductive success. link.springer.com/article/10.100


The researchers also noted that DNA’s influence on the age at which someone loses their virginity has remained stable -- with heritability explaining about 26% to 28% of the variation -- even as cultural influences have caused people to start having sex at younger and younger ages.
“We show that a substantial proportion of variation in AFS is due to genetic factors, which likely act through a variety of biological mechanisms,” the study authors concluded.
This is the biggest tragedy of the modern age. The people most capable of raising kids and most likely to produce offspring who can generate wealth are the least likely to make babies. Many lines of evidence point toward dysgenic breeding practices.

https://www.unz.com/anepigone/education-iq-and-fertility/
https://www.economist.com/prospero/2012/06/14/the-disadvantage-of-smarts
You say less intelligent people are good at the important things. What are they?

Would you rather be a good brain surgeon or a good parent? Would you rather be a good corporate executive or a good friend? More intelligent people don't always make good parents or friends. Intelligent women make the worst kind of parents, simply because they are less likely to become parents in the first place. There is also some evidence that children of more intelligent women are more likely to suffer from health and behavioural problems, probably due to the fact that they tend to have children later.

Why?

Because reproductive success is the ultimate goal of all living organisms, so intelligent women are more likely to go against such evolutionary design. My theory would also predict that intelligent men should be less likely to become parents, but data do not confirm that. Some suggest that women prefer to have children with more intelligent men, but the data contradict this too. Men's income or education has no effect on their likelihood of becoming parents. Intelligence doesn't allow us to do better what we are designed by evolution to do.
Rob Henderson
@robkhenderson
"in general, university education increased negative attitudes about children and decreased positive attitudes, while religiosity increased positive attitudes about children and decreased negative ones” link.springer.com/article/10.100
https://twitter.com/robkhenderson/status/1319745953696522240

https://evolution-institute.org/why-do-modern-people-have-so-few-children/

55.3% of California births are to mothers age 30+. In San Francisco? 82.5%.
Feb 24
Replying to 
Going to the Zoo in Phoenix is nuts: tons of tattooed 19 year-old parents walking around with babies and toddlers and strollers. Oh, and they earn $13/hour and are already homeowners. It's like another dimension if you come from SF.
Feb 24
Replying to 
Very scary and dysgenic. While the industrious high IQ class don’t have kids, you see 17 year old teen moms in middle America with tattoos pushing around toddlers and the father in opioids on disability being paid for by techies in SF. This is our future

"FRISCOOOOOO" -CELLSKINI

https://www.instagram.com/p/BrUUbkDAfUD/
 Stories Like Hers Are Common Among Native Girls, Especially Native Girls With A Preponderance Of Native Hawaiian Genes Like She. Why? because The More Native Hawaiian Genes You Have The Earlier You Reach Puberty, The Lower The Social Class You Come From And Hence The Weaker The Sexual Mores You're Inculcated With And All Of This Results In Many Of These Girls Losing Their Virginity In Their Early Teens And Having Children By Their Late Teens To Early Twenties! Plus, She Has Chester The Molester As Her Uncle. This Is Another Indication Of Her Lower Class Background (Sexual Deviants Like Her Uncle Are More Common Among The Uneducated, Impoverished, Low IQ, Lower Classes)!
https://www.instagram.com/keanuheaaa/
This Is The Girl That I'm Referring To In The Paragraph Above. She Was Molested By Her Hawaiian "Uncle" At The Tender Age Of 13? 
http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Honolulu-Magazine/Style-List/October-2017/Kini-Zamora-Spring-Summer-2018-Fashion-Show-at-Iolani-Palace/
 Mar 11
Sexual offending runs in families: A 37-year nationwide study 
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4469797/

 "She Wanna Get Molested By A Real Pervert!" - Showt Dawg

    1. Among 6k twins, heritability of age at first sexual intercourse depended on women’s history of child sexual abuse (CSA). Heritability decreased from .39 to .0 when women experienced CSA suggesting CSA is more influential for women’s than men’s sexual debut
    1. Jan 20
...also agree. I had a brief conversation with , who is updating his earlier cross-cultural study of sexual preferences. He said that virginity is much less of a deciding factor than it used to be. Could we have predicted the cultural lability of this preference?..

Promiscuity is becoming more common for women, but less common for men.
https://twitter.com/degenrolf/status/986628501208993798
WE GOTTA START PETITIONING FOR THE USE OF CHASTITY BELTS. WE'VE GOTTA RETURN TO THE USE OF CHASTITY BELTS IF WE WANNA GET THIS "REMAIN CHASTE BEFORE MARRIAGE" MOVEMENT ROLLING.

The Age At 1st Birth Is Increasing Among European And European Descendants, But In Rapid Decline Among The Black And Brown Underclass Of The World!

Among the Mohave, women were famous for their licentious habits and disinclination to stick with one man. Caesar (yes, that Caesar) was scandalized to note that in Iron Age Britain, “Ten and even twelve have wives common to them, and particularly brothers among brothers….” During his three months in Tahiti in 1769, Captain James Cook and his crew found that Tahitians “gratified every appetite and passion before witnesses.” In an account of Cook’s voyage first published in 1773, John Hawkesworth wrote of “[a] young man, nearly six feet high, perform[ing] the rites of Venus with a little girl about 11 or 12 years of age, before several of our people and a great number of natives, without the least sense of its being indecent or improper, but, as appeared, in perfect conformity to the custom of the place.” Some of the older islander women who were observing this amorous display apparently called out instructions to the girl, although Cook tells us, “Young as she was, she did not seem much to stand in need of [them].”

Samuel Wallis, another ship captain who spent time in Tahiti, reported, “The women in General are very handsome, some really great Beauties, yet their Virtue was not proof against a Nail.” The Tahitians’ fascination with iron resulted in a de-facto exchange of a single nail for a sexual tryst with a local woman. By the time Wallis set sail, most of his men were sleeping on deck, as there were no nails left from which to hang their hammocks.



Data: Compared to highly intelligent American women, mentally disabled women have twice the number of kids


 There Are Two Types Of Human Phenotypes. There's The r-selected Phenotype Which Is Typically Of A Lower IQ, Reproduces At An Early Age, Produces More Offspring, And Invests Less (Places Less Emphasis) On Education. Then There's The K-selected Phenotype Which Is Of A Higher IQ, Reproduces Later In Life (If At All), And Channels Offspring Into The Direction Of Higher Education. This Latter Strategy Requires Higher Intelligence, Lower Time Preference, And Greater Wealth. You're Poor, Colored People. Get Away From ME And Read Below!
 Mar 10
I can’t wait to have kids!
BASED ON THE TWEETS OF THE MEXICAN GIRL AND THE SAMOAN MOTHER AND DAUGHTER WHERE DO YOU THINK THESE PEOPLE FALL ON THE r-K CONTINUUM? WHY DO THEY FALL THERE? BECAUSE OF GENETIC, BIOLOGICAL, AND SOCIOCULTURAL TRAITS. THEY INHERITED GENES FROM THEIR FEMALE ANCESTORS THAT PREDISPOSED THEM TO REACH MENARCHE AT AN EARLY AGE AND WERE EXPOSED TO AN ENVIRONMENT (TYPICALLY A LOWER INCOME, LOWER STATUS, FATHERLESS HOME IN A POVERTY STRICKEN, CRIME RIDDEN NEIGHBORHOOD) THAT BIOLOGICALLY AND PSYCHOLOGICALLY INCLINED THEM TO HAVE SEX AND GIVE BIRTH AT A YOUNG AGE.    
 Feb 21
My daughter and my grandson! Looking good...

saiosia

@peleili dafuqqqqq
 THEY GIVE BIRTH TO THEIR 1ST CHILD AROUND THE SAME AGE AS THEIR MOTHER. THEN THEY CELEBRATE TEENAGE PREGNANCY!
https://www.instagram.com/p/3AT7RNG1ZP/ 
Let's Take A Look At This One Again. A College Education Still Couldn't Stop Her From Acting On Her Hormonal Drive To Have A Child Before Age 25,Which Is Around The Same Age Her Uneducated Mother 1st Gave A Child Live.  
 https://notpoliticallycorrect.me/2016/04/02/the-role-of-leptin-and-sexual-maturity-in-black-girls/

What are evolutionary causes for this? Well, seeing Africa’s life expectancy, the rate of parasitic load as well as disease in Africa, and Rushton’s r/K Life History Theory, which states that those more r selected will have more children and show less care for them whereas those more k selected will have less progeny, but show more care, we can easily see how such a mechanism evolved. With IQ being highly correlated with life expectancy (at .95), we can see part of the reason why, for instance, black women evolved to have higher rates of 2 egg twinning in comparison to whites (16 per 1000 for blacks, 8 per 1000 for whites and 4 per 1000 for Orientals). To quote Rushton from Race, Evolution, and Behavior:

Black women, compared to white women, average a shorter period of ovulation and produce more eggs per ovulation in addition to all the other characteristics in Table 1.1. As mentioned, the rate of dizygotic twinning, a direct index of egg production, is less than 4 per 1,000 births among Mongoloids, 8 per 1,000 among Caucasoids, and 16 or greater per 1,000 among Negroids. (pg. 6)

This is a clear evolutionary strategy. Have more children where it’s less hospitable and there is a higher mortality rate, especially for young children and have fewer children where it is more stable and less environmental dangers are around.

Even more evidence to bolster my claim is how 82 percent of black women are overweight or obese (Ogden et al, 2014). Genes related to obesity have also been found in African-Americans, as well as European-Americans, which also bolster the claim seeing as the genes were found to do the same things in both populations. To quote myself from the above article:

In a study published back in 2013, researchers were looking for obesity genes in African Americans. The study, which involved more than 70,000 men and women of African descent, they were able to identify 3 SNPs that were associated with obesity and BMI in the sample population. What was also found, was that those same genetic sequences also heighten rates of obesity in peoples with no African ancestry, all of the genetic variants associated with obesity were also found in European populations. The same genes found in African populations did the same in European populations, and vice versa.


Oct 2
"Parents’ Education Is More Important Than Their Wealth in Shaping Their Children’s Intelligence." Windfall wealth may even be detrimental.

It is tempting to argue that genetic influence on bodily dimensions is one thing, but that cognitive and behavioral traits are another. But this line has already been crossed. Often when a person participates in a genetic study of disease, he or she fills out a form providing information on height, weight, and number of years of education. By compiling the information on the number of years of education for over four hundred thousand people of European ancestry whose genomes have been surveyed in the course of various disease studies, Daniel Benjamin and colleagues identified seventy-four genetic variations each of which has overwhelmingly evidence of being more common in people with more years of education than in people with fewer years even after controlling for such possibly confounding factors as heterogeneity in the study population. Benjamin and colleagues also showed that the power of genetics to predict number of years of education is far from trivial, even though social influences surely have a greater average influence on this behavior than genetics. They showed that in the European ancestry population in which they carried out their study, it should be possible to build a genetic predictor in which the probability of completing twelve years of education is 96 percent for the twentieth of people with the highest prediction compared to 37 percent for the lowest.

 Oct 18
The Genetics of University Success “Twin analyses indicate substantial additive genetic influence on university entrance exam achievement (57%), university enrolment (51%), university quality (57%) and university achievement (46%).”

How do these genetic variations influence educational attainment? The obvious guess is that they have a direct effect on academic abilities, but that is probably wrong. A study of more than one hundred thousand Icelanders showed that the variations also increase the age at which a woman has her first child, and that this a more powerful effect than the one on the number of years of education. It is possible that these variations exert their effect indirectly, by nudging people to defer having children, which makes it easier for them to complete their education. This shows that when we discover biological differences governing behavior, they may not be working in the way we naively assume.
  1.  Oct 21
    2. It will surprise no one that IQ and age of first birth are inversely correlated. Table includes whites only
    IntelligenceAvgAge
    Real dumbs22.3
    Pretty dumbs23.4
    Normals24.2
    Pretty smarts25.3
    Really smarts27.0
Average differences across populations in the frequencies of the mutations that affect educational attainment have not yet been identified. But a sobering finding is that older people in Iceland are systematically different from younger people in having a higher genetically predicted number of years of education.  Augustin Kong, the lead author of the Icelandic study, showed that this reflects natural selection over the last century against people with more predicted education, likely because of selection for people who began having children at a younger age. Given that the genetic underpinnings of the number of years of education a person achieves have measurably changed within a century in a single population under the pressure of natural selection, it seems highly likely that the trait differs across populations too. (Who We Are And How We Got Here)
Oct 11
IQ & parental SES both associated with educational attainment, though IQ appears a little more important (i.e., you'd rather have high IQ than high parental SES if you could only have one)
Your Parents IQ And Ability To Delay Gratification (Low Time Preference; Sexual Restraint) Are The Best Predictors Of The Level Of Education You'll Attain.

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/07/staying-in-school-genetics/565832/









More
Forget private school, it’s all in the genes
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/forget-private-school-its-all-in-thegenes-hzxfj8nwd
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/06/02/no-point-sending-children-eton-education-genes-says-geneticist/
  1. Jul 17
    y'all ever b in school staring at the board but you really thinking about getting dick💀
This Is How Most Black And Brown Girls Think When In Class!

https://www.amazon.com/Genes-Impact-Genetics-Education-Achievement/dp/1118482816

https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2019/11/12/how-the-pursuit-of-better-education-career-opportunities-may-be-creating-regional-genetic-inequalities/?mc_cid=4309db62bb&mc_eid=e2d6a0f33b
'High heritability of educational achievement reflects many genetically influenced traits...' out in PNAS:
https://www.pnas.org/content/111/42/15273


More
Highly educated have fewer kids, genes linked with educational attainment getting rarer

It's a bit ironic that IQ can predict basically every positive life outcome except the evolutionary most important one, reproductive success
Posted by at