OK, I'm Going To Work* On This Blogpost Today. Once It's Done I Hope
To Make You Niggers Realize That This Nigger Uprising Is Based On A LIE (A Distortion And Misperception Of Reality). (This Is Just More Proof That A Belief Need Not Be True For It To Be Adaptive (Beneficial To Its Adherents Lives And Ultimately Their Genes).
https://www.amren.com/archives/reports/the-color-of-crime-2016-revised-edition/
https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1278650190375739393
https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1278650190375739393
Black homicides are about three times as seasonal as white homicides. Unwanted Party Guests at summer outdoor parties where nobody can control who attends are particularly likely to lead to arguments and shootings. Winter parties have doors to turn away UPGs.
https://www.takimag.com/article/crime-roaring-twenties/
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1286391607865090051
But the 13.4% of the US population that's black comprised 54.9% of all known murder offenders in FBI 2018 official crime stats. So, nonblacks commit only 45% of murders, but get killed by the police 75% of the time. Why do cops shoot nonblacks so much relative to their lethality?
But since the best justification for police shootings is reasonable fear of murder, and since blacks committed 55% of the murders in 2018, my default expectation is blacks should be 55% of victims of police killings. But they are only 25%.
So why cops shoot nonblacks so much?
https://twitter.com/MattWalshBlog/status/1286391607865090051
There were 14 unarmed black men shot by cops last year, accounting for .0004 percent of all black people arrested. Ive been reading into these cases, and even 14 it turns out is an overstatement. Some of the "victims" were shot while trying to run cops over or steal their weapons
By the way, 48 police officers were killed in the line of duty in the same year.
The great question only people like
will ask: in these cases where primarily black people are being shot by other blacks, do Black Lives Matter when a white cop isn't taking them?
https://medium.com/@agent.orange.chicago/unarmed-killings-of-african-americans-numbered-under-10-last-year-a-400-reduction-since-2015-e54f3eeb67ae
https://medium.com/@agent.orange.chicago/how-roland-fryers-controversial-study-on-racial-bias-by-police-actually-shows-negligible-bias-ea3a8b1fd293
https://ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2020/06/03/american-racism-and-the-anti-white-left/
https://twitter.com/EPoe187/status/1268156513891291139
https://twitter.com/LeonydusJohnson/status/1267466345844740098
https://twitter.com/larryelder/status/1272261173698654208
https://twitter.com/kirkegaardemil/status/1276975120385531904
https://twitter.com/larryelder/status/1271783160649375744
https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1258919971851169792
https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1279956767892361217
https://twitter.com/Steve_Sailer/status/1274104636757049344
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1267273330794483712
https://twitter.com/larryelder/status/1269270437873070080?lang=en
https://twitter.com/larryelder/status/1266865585570189313?lang=en
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1265827224281849856
https://twitter.com/1984Brotherhood/status/1276338137246072832
https://twitter.com/ZachG932/status/1266926255082999810
https://twitter.com/larryelder/status/1084380867441520641)
For Every White On Black Assault There Are Countless Numbers Of Black On White Assaults And Murders Committed Under The Guise Of Black Racial Justice, Which Is Just An Excuse To Beat The Shit Out Of Or Kill A Cracker!
This Tweet Will Explain How Most Of You Arrive At Your Beliefs And Opinions Regarding The Black Lives Terrorist Organization (You Internalize One-Sided Information From Your Biased Friends And Family And Social And News Media Rather Than Researching And Coming To Conclusions On Your Own).
The Tweets Above Will Explain Why So Many People Tweet And Protest In Support* Of The Black Lives Terrorist Organization In Spite Of The Fact That There's No Credible Evidence Supporting The Group's Beliefs (There's No Credible Evidence That Blacks Are Disproportionately Targeted By Police, Disproportionately Abused And Murdered By Police, Or That White Racism Is Inherent In Law Enforcement, The Legal System, And All Other American Institutions, Etc.)
*The Desire To Be Approved Of And Accepted Outweighs The Desire To Know The Truth And Tell The Truth.
The Above Tweets Will Explain To You Why So Many People Continue To Believe The Black Lives Terrorist Organization Is Justifiable* Even Though Its Basis (That Black Lives Are Impeded And Imperiled By White Racism) Flies In The Face Of Facts (Statistics And Scientific Studies That Disprove Their Beliefs).
*To Signal Commitment To The Group You Must Deny Reality (The Truth) And Counter Reality With Your Group's False Beliefs And Inaccurate Ideology.
How much of the resistance to statistical reality (e.g., only 14 police shooting deaths involving unarmed blacks in all of 2019) when it comes to opinions about BLM can be blamed on female empathy and the inexperience and idealism of youth?
Read CPK's Response. It's Spot On.
https://vdare.com/posts/support-for-blm-by-age-race-sex-and-education-massive-support-from-educated-white-women-under-35
https://vdare.com/posts/support-for-blm-by-age-race-sex-and-education-massive-support-from-educated-white-women-under-35
https://twitter.com/a_centrism/status/1512065601933520898
I'm an unmarried college-educated white female in my 30s who grew up in the upper-middle class and I presently have a BLM sign in my front yard and I've never had any black friends and I've been on antidepressants since high school.
1/n 53% of white liberals (48% of white Dems) think that white people should feel guilty about racial inequality
White neighbours kneel down and beg their black neighbours for forgiveness on behalf of whites for years of racism. Such a beautiful moment.
Systemic racism is the White Evilness that nobody can actually see or measure, but that you must take on faith is the cause of all the problems of blacks.
In turn, these awkward facts help explain the popularity of the unfalsifiable "Systemic Racism" theory to explain away everything. Sure, these black individuals are 2nd generation preppies, but they are dragged down by America's invisible, unmeasurable miasma of Systemic Racism.
More plausible than "Systemic Racism" as a factor helping explain poor black achievement in 2020 is "Systemic Black Supremacism" in which whites constantly tell blacks that they are awesome and are only being held back by white malignancy.
*I'm Compiling Tweets And Statistics. In The Meantime Read The Outline For Chapters 1, 5, 6, 9, 11, And 12 In Particular From This Book: http://culturism.us/booksummaries/EvPsychBehndPolitics.pdf
Technology Has Lead To The Creation Of An Abundance Of Wealth And Made Life Easier (Easier To Accumulate Wealth, Attain Status, Acquire Sex) This In Turn Has Given r-Selected Strategists An Advantage In Society And Created A Selection For More Liberal Beliefs And Behaviors (Read About The Specific Liberal Beliefs And Behaviors In Chapters 11 And 12). This Is Where We Currently Are In American Society.
What does r-selection
produce in a human population? Well, it might, say, be averse to
competition* and all means of selection by measures of performance*. It
would favour the production of large numbers of offspring at an early
age, by early onset of mating, promiscuity, and the raising of children
by single mothers with minimal investment by them and little or none by
the fathers (leaving the raising of children to the State). It would
welcome other r-selected people into the community, and hence favour immigration from heavily r
populations. It would oppose any kind of selection based upon
performance*, whether by intelligence tests, academic records, physical
fitness, or job performance. It would strive to create the ideal r
environment of unlimited resources, where all were provided all their
basic needs without having to do anything but consume. It would oppose
and be repelled by the K component of the population, seeking to marginalise it as toxic, privileged, or exploiters of the real people. It might even welcome conflict with K warriors of adversaries to reduce their numbers in otherwise pointless foreign adventures.
Update: So this dataset was actually released. Aggregate group numbers actually mask a fairly substantial partisan divide, with (both non-white and white) Democrats far more likely to support eliminating standardized tests as a college admissions component than Republicans.
*THE ELIMINATION OF SAT AND ACT SCORES AS CRITERIA TO ADMISSION INTO UNIVERSITIES IS A PRIME EXAMPLE OF THIS.
Colleges and universities that engage in affirmative action to "increase the diversity" of the student body, are engaged in institutional racism. It's as simple as that. If you favor the policy, at least have the decency to be honest.
https://twitter.com/a_centrism/status/1298309873634082817
Asian-black gaps on the SAT college admission exam are immense, with only 1% of blacks scoring 1400 or above compared to 24% of Asians. At present, there are about 20 high-scoring Asians for every high-scoring black, and this ratio will only go up.
https://twitter.com/a_centrism/status/1283872823187066889
https://twitter.com/wdunlap/status/1279774573165113344
https://twitter.com/wdunlap/status/1279774573165113344
https://twitter.com/vdare/status/1284666353673277441
https://twitter.com/a_centrism/status/1284244367075676166
https://twitter.com/a_centrism/status/1284244367075676166
GPAs are "inherently" tied to IQ, and IQ differences at the individual and group levels are tied — mostly or at least partly, respectively — to genetic differences.
Genetic differences produce "racist" outcomes.
To defeat "racism" we must defeat genetic differences.
More Proof That Admission Standards At Elite Universities Are Lowered For Niggers And Beaners And More Proof That A College Degree Is No Longer An Accurate Indication Of High Intelligence. This Is Why I Don't Respects No Colored Kids Wit College Degrees These Days.
www.nytimes.com
https://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/24/us/top-colleges-take-more-blacks-but-which-ones.html?smid=tw-share
Top Colleges Take More Blacks, but Which Ones?
https://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/24/us/top-colleges-take-more-blacks-but-which-ones.html?smid=tw-share
It's All Rubbish.
And K-troop? Once a society in which they initially predominated creates sufficient wealth to support a burgeoning r population, they will find themselves outnumbered and outvoted, especially once the r wave removes the firebreaks put in place when K was king to guard against majoritarian rule by an urban underclass. The K population will continue to do what they do best: preserving the institutions and infrastructure which sustain life, defending the society in the military, building and running businesses, creating the basic science and technologies to cope with emerging problems and expand the human potential, and governing an increasingly complex society made up, with every generation, of a population, and voters, who are fundamentally unlike them.
Note that the r/K
model completely explains the “crunchy to soggy” evolution of societies
which has been remarked upon since antiquity. Human societies always
start out, as our genetic heritage predisposes us to, K-selected.
We work to better our condition and turn our large brains to
problem-solving and, before long, the privation our ancestors endured
turns into a pretty good life and then, eventually, abundance. But
abundance is what selects for the r strategy. Those who would not have reproduced, or have as many children in the K days of yore, now have babies-a-poppin’ as in the introduction to Idiocracy, and before long, not waiting for genetics to do its inexorable work, but purely by a shift in incentives, the rs outvote the Ks and the Ks begin to count the days until their society runs out of the wealth which can be plundered from them.
Please Familiarize Yourselves With r and K Strategists. I'll Excerpt Passages From This Book Later This Year.
In
the global meritocracy, the best and the brightest have never had it so
good. They form a sort of international elite and often marry with
those of other races. Their common feature is their status among members
of different racial groups. Nonetheless, there is no reason to assume
that the racial appearance of vast areas of the world, including China,
India, sub-Saharan Africa, and the Middle East, which have not changed
in recorded history, will change anytime soon. This is not the case in
the developed world, however, where birthrates have been plunging for
the past two centuries to the point that they are currently below
replacement level, except among certain religious groups. Barring some
major change in ideology and consequent policy, it seems likely that the
United States and Western Europe each year will see an increasing
percentage of the population composed of first and second-generation
immigrants, increasingly from the underdeveloped countries of the Third
World.
The
ultimate evolutionary irony lurking on the horizon is that having
conquered and colonized the world in the previous two centuries,
Europeans and their descendants became so wealthy that they brought
about their own extinction. The only exceptions are the subgroups
(fundamentalist Christians, traditional Catholics, Latter-Day Saints,
Orthodox Jews) that are most hostile to acknowledging the evolutionary
perspective. But this has not stopped them from operating according to
its dictates. To the contrary, they do so with an unconscious vengeance.
Race: The Reality of Human Differences. Sarich, Miele, p. 240-241
The only thing that must die... is
RACISM.
RIDING THE WORLD OF RACISM WILL BE ABOUT AS EASY AS RIDING PEOPLE OF THEIR PREFERENCE AND FAVORITISM TOWARDS KIN. IT WON'T HAPPEN AND IT WON'T HAPPEN BECAUSE THERE ARE GENETIC BENEFITS THAT ACCRUE TO PEOPLE WHO FAVOR THEIR RACIAL GROUP AND PEOPLE UNCONSCIOUSLY ACT ON THOSE BENEFITS. MOREOVER, EVEN WHEN PEOPLE MAKE A CONSCIOUS EFFORT TO SUPPRESS THEIR RACIST TENDENCIES BUILT-IN COGNITIVE BIASES LEAD THEM TO DO THE OPPOSITE (UNCONSCIOUSLY ENGAGE IN RACIST THOUGHT AND BEHAVIOR).
White people are discriminated against in the economy and education, are made to have a negative view of their own race, and are blamed for things they didn't do. Leftists call these things racism when done to anyone else. This is a semantic game motivated by anti-white bigotry.
The fondness of these "white priests of anti-racism" for blacks is largely a function of their social, economic, cultural, and physical distance from them (and their neurotic guilt about this).
Replying to
It's almost as if the fewer blacks in an area (e.g., Portland, Seattle, Minneapolis), the more whites tend to be true believers in Black Lives Matter dogmas, whereas whites with more contact with blacks (E.g., Detroit, Atlanta metros) trust more in their Lived Experience...
Black Lives Matter To Crackers Like This As Long As Those Black Lives Don't Live Near Crackers Like This, As Long As Crackers Like This Don't Have To Interact With Those Black Lives, And As Long As Signaling To Other Liberal Crackers That Black Lives Matter Benefits Crackers Like This. You Dig? I Doubt Either Of These Crackers Have Nigger Friends And I Doubt Either Of These Crackers Could Tolerate Nigger Culture If Exposed To It.
New paper raises serious doubts about the validity of measures of implicit bias.
"[S]ubstantial numbers of white Americans that the IAT and the AMP classify as free of prejudice openly endorse explicitly negative stereotypes of Black Americans." (!)
Last week, I mentioned that New Yorker writer Malcolm Gladwell was deeply disturbed to find that, like 80 percent of all people and 48 percent of blacks, he scored as anti-black on the Implicit Association Test, which measures how automatically you associate words like "criminal" with black or white faces.
A reader responded:
"Could it be that much of the fanatical anti-racism that so richly abounds these days is overcompensation? … Are outspoken and emotional anti-racists, or people who seem to try "too hard" to display their egalitarian acceptance of members of other races, generally people who are merely trying very hard to convince themselves that they do not harbor racist beliefs or feelings? 'I can't possibly be racist if I hate racists so much!'"
Nicely illustrating his point, a long Washington Post article about the IAT by Shankar Vedantam began with:
"… a 34-year-old white woman sat down in her Washington office to take a psychological test. Her office decor attested to her passion for civil rights—as a senior activist at a national gay rights organization, and as a lesbian herself, fighting bias and discrimination is what gets her out of bed every morning." [See No Bias, January 23, 2005]
Unsurprisingly, this "hate" hater tested as disliking blacks.
In contrast to Gladwell and the anonymous anti-discrimination warrioress, I tested as slightly pro-black. I'm a lot more skeptical than Gladwell about the IAT, but my result does strike me as roughly accurate about myself.
Of course, I get smeared as a racist a lot because, not having a guilty conscience, I don't feel constrained to lie about race like Gladwell, and so many others, do all the time.
All The Better If The Cracker Gets Maimed Or Murdered During His War Against Whites Since It Will Truly Signal His Commitment To The Destruction Of The White Race And Solidify His Place (His Place Among The Pantheon Of BLM Protestors).
Looks like an interesting paper: Among social liberals, learning about White privilege reduces sympathy, increases blame, and decreases external attributions for White people struggling with poverty. psycnet.apa.org/record/2019-22
...The two parents of a brood of children are an even better example. Their genes are tied up in the same package, their children, so what is good for one is good for the other, and each has an interest in keeping the other alive and healthy. These shared interests set the stage for companionate love and marital love to evolve.
And in some cases organisms may benefit other organisms at a cost to themselves, which biologists call altruism. Altruism in this technical sense can evolve in two main ways. First, since relatives share genes, any gene that inclines an organism toward helping a relative will increase the chance of survival of a copy of itself that sits inside that relative, even if the helper sacrifices its own fitness in the generous act. Such genes will, on average, come to predominate, as long as the cost to the helper is less than the benefit to the recipient discounted by their degree of relatedness. Family love - the cherishing of children, siblings, parents, grandparents, uncles, and aunts, nieces and nephews, and cousins - can evolve. This is called nepotistic altruism.
...
...In traditional foraging societies, genetic relatives are more likely to live together, work in each other's gardens, protect each other, and adopt each other's needy or orphaned children, and are less likely to attack, feud with, and kill each other. Even in modern societies, which tend to sunder ties of kinship, the more closely two people are genetically related, the more inclined they are to come to one another's aid, especially in life-or-death situations.
...
...What we call "ethnic groups" are very large extended families, and though in a modern ethnic group the family ties are too distant for kin-based altruism to be significant, this was not true of smaller coalitions in which we evolved. Even today ethnic groups often perceive themselves as large families, and the role of ethnic loyalties in group-against-group violence violence is all too obvious.
(The Blank Slate)
Replying to @JennMJacksonPhD
"No, Black people *cannot* be racist."
And yet somehow blacks find a way to commit hate crimes at a higher rate than any other group in the US.
Most people today would acknowledge that racism is a corrosive force in society. So why do we keep attaching “meanings to bodies”? In Are We Born Racist? a book published by Berkeley’s Greater Good Science Center, Princeton psychologist Susan Fiske suggests that humans are hardwired for prejudice. “Conditioned by millennia of tribal warfare and fierce competition for limited resources,” she writes, “we are always looking for cues to help us make snap judgments of others.” In other words, stereotyping may be adaptive—predisposing us to use easily identifiable physical characteristics such as age, sex, and skin color to distinguish friend from foe.
New analysis (unz.com/anepigone/impo) replicates old analyses (ideasanddata.wordpress.com/2020/06/03/ame) and finds that white Americans, who are condemned as being uniquely racist, are the least likely to care about their race.
IF YOU DON'T WANT TO BE ACCUSED OF RACISM OR WANT TO ADJUST YOUR BEHAVIOR SO THAT YOU'RE NOT ACCUSED OF RACISM AVOID NIGGERS AND NIGGER EMPATHIZERS (LIBERALS). IT'S VERY SIMPLE. I'VE SEVERED TIES WILL ALL NIGGERS. NOW I CAN BE AS RACIST AS I'M GENETICALLY AND SOCIOCULTURALLY INCLINED.
Anyone who teaches the psychology of categorization has been hit with this question from a puzzled student: "You're telling us that putting things into categories is rational and makes us smart. But we've always been taught that putting people into categories is irrational and makes us sexist and racist. If categorization is so great when we think about ducks and chairs, why is it so terrible when we think about genders and ethnic groups?" As with many ingenious questions from students, this one uncovers a shortcoming in the literature, not a flaw in their understanding.
The idea that stereotypes are inherently irrational owes more to a condescension toward ordinary people than it does to good psychological research. Many researchers having shown that stereotypes existed in the minds of their subjects, assumed that the stereotypes had to be irrational, because they were uncomfortable with the possibility that some trait might be statistically true of some group. They never actually checked. That began to change in the 1980s, and now a fair amount is known about the accuracy of stereotypes.
With some important exceptions, stereotypes are in fact not inaccurate when assessed against objective benchmarks such as census figures or the reports of the stereotyped people themselves. People who believe that African Americans are more likely to be on welfare than whites, that Jews have higher average incomes than WASPs, that business students are more conservative than students in the arts, that women are more likely than men to want to lose weight, and that men are more likely than women to swat a fly with their bare hands, are not being irrational or bigoted. Those beliefs are correct. People's stereotypes are generally consistent with the statistics, and in many cases their bias is to underestimate the real differences between sexes or ethnic groups. This does not mean that the stereotyped traits are unchangeable, of course, or that people think they are unchangeable, only that people perceive the traits fairly accurately at the time.
Moreover, when people believe that ethnic groups have characteristic traits, they are never mindless stereotypers who literally believe that each and every member of the group possesses those traits. People may think that Germans are, on average, more efficient than non-Germans, but no one believes that every last German is more efficient than every non-German. And people have no trouble overriding a stereotype when they have good information about an individual. Contrary to a common accusation, teachers' impressions of their individual pupils are not contaminated by their stereotypes of race, gender, or socioeconomic status. The teachers' impressions accurately reflect the pupils's performance as measured by objective tests. (The Blank Slate)
Blacks Tend Not To Be Strong Swimmers. This Is An Accurate Stereotype.
Dear #BlackLivesMatter,
Per , 15 unarmed blacks were killed by cops last year. Per the CDC, an average of 400 blacks drown every year. So a black person is 26x more likely to drown than to be an unarmed and killed by a cop.
Replying to and 3 others
If Black Lives Matter really wanted to save the lives of young blacks, a constructive thing it could do is call for free swimming lessons. Way too many black youths drown each year. But that doesn't involve hating white people, so nobody is interested in that.
My latest report: Young black men in US are far more likely to die in a car accident than to be shot by police. Yet the vast majority of liberal black or white respondents get that wrong. Why? Vivid media narratives, ideology & psychology
Her Reposting Of Other People's Tweets Regarding The Nigger Uprisings Are Not Representative Of The Rest Of Her Siblings And Parents. (I
Think The Only Reason She Reposts Them Is Because Of The Social
Pressure The Black Community Places On The Game Of Basketball. So To Avoid
The Wrath Of Blacks And Ostracism From The Basketball Community She
Reluctantly Sides With Them. Do You See The Unconscious Pressure That
Social Groups Can Put On You To Conform With Them?)
WHITE FANS OF PROFESSIONAL SPORTS (i.e. WHITE OBSESSION, REVERANCE, AND DEFERENCE TOWARDS NIGGER ATHLETES) HAVE EASED THE WAY FOR NIGGER CULTURE (URBAN, UNDERCLASS, r-SELECTED, NIGGER CULTURE) TO PERVADE AND PERMEATE ALL ASPECTS OF AMERICAN SOCIETY THIS IN TURN HAS MADE IT MORE ACCEPTABLE FOR WHITES TO IMITATE AND EMULATE THE MANY BOORISH AND BARBAROUS ELEMENTS OF NIGGER CULTURE! - PETER DAGAMPAT Ph.D.
18.22M in 2019, 5..7M in 2020 for Game 5--at a time when people are virtually forced to stay home. White males tuning out and probably becoming more likely to identify as White, resenting the constant propaganda and guilt mongering.
Most NBA fans are middle- and working-class White men. This could be a sign they are fed up with the constant preaching and guilt-tripping--and perhaps that they identify more strongly as White in a country where they are hated by our elites & a great many non-Whites. Excellent.
https://twitter.com/EPoe187/status/1307038276478480385
Tell ME, Where Are All Of The Black Lives Matter Protests And Protestors When Niggers Kill Niggers? No Where To Be Found.
Systemic racism is the term that progressives use to describe any disparity that favors whites (or, increasingly, Asians). So, the NBA is not systemically racist despite being massively disproportionately black.
To Tha Necc!
RIP Carl Lewis
We have to protect the youth!
you gotta get our city together. All those fancy speeches and parties ain’t helping this Violence. We need real people involved. No more announcements
Instead, Darkies Revert To Blaming Whitey (The Supposed White Supremacy, White Privilege, And Systemic White Racism That Niggers Have To Deal With)! Until They Attribute Their Problems To Themselves (Their Genes, Their Culture, The Unwillingness To Accept Blame) They'll Never Change.
The agenda of Black Lives Matter is far different from the slogan
The media never told you about the BLM organizations and their Marxist founders, they only told you about the concept and the movement. That’s why I wrote my book.
