https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2003/10/why_do_women_li.html
https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2006/06/cads_and_dads.html
https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2004/01/cads_vs_dads_ii.html
https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2006/06/cads_and_dads.html
https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2004/01/cads_vs_dads_ii.html
Today, women are far more even in their reproductive success, with most women having between 1-3 children. Further, the existence of the social safety net and other developments, such as women gaining entry into the work place and welfare, have allowed women who leaned more towards the r-side of things to be more successful than they once were. This would translated into more r-selected traits—earlier puberty, increased promiscuity, and lower IQ—becoming more prevalent in the population, even if men of all walks were about as reproductively successful today as they were in the past.
When The British 1st Came To Hawaii (When They Brought They Lil Sail Boats To Hawaii) The Lower Class Hawaiian Females (The Non-Royalty Hawaiian Females, The Lower Class Hawaiian Females) Would Swim Out To Them (The English) And Have SEX With Them On They Lil Sail Boats With The Hope Of Being Taken Away (Swept Away) From The Hell Hole (Hawaii) That They Were In. NOWADAYS (TODAY), You See The Same Thing. You Still See Lower Class (Non-Royalty), Hawaiian Females Dressing Up To Show They Bodies Off And Throw They Bodies (Throw Theyselves) At EUROPEAN, EAST ASIAN, FILIPINO, POLYNESIAN (SAMOAN&TONGAN), MELANESIAN AND MEXICAN TRAVELERS (FOREIGNERS). NOW, WHY DO YOU STILL SEE THIS TODAY? (200+ YEARS HAVE PASSED AND YOU STILL SEE THIS TODAY!) YOU STILL SEE THIS TODAY BECAUSE TIMES HAVEN'T CHANGED. HAWAIIAN FEMALES (WHETHER CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY) STILL RECOGNIZE THAT HAWAII IS AN r-selected ENVIRONMENT AND THEY STILL REALIZE THAT BEING SEXUALLY PROMISCUOUS PAYS OFF IN THIS ENVIRONMENT BECAUSE BEING SO (BEING SEXUALLY PROMISCUOUS AND HENCE r-selected) ENSURES THAT THEY'LL BE ABLE TO SECURE THE BEST MALE GENES IN THIS UNSTABLE AND UNPREDICTABLE ENVIRONMENT (IN THIS r-selected HAWAIIAN ENVIRONMENT) AND IT ENSURES THIS BECAUSE THE HAWAIIAN FEMALES CONSCIOUSLY OR UNCONSCIOUSLY RECOGNIZE THAT THE MALES IN THIS ENVIRONMENT AREN'T GOING TO BE AROUND LONG (THEY'RE NOT GONNA BE AROUND LONG BECAUSE THEY'RE JUST VISITING OR BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO INVEST IN THEY OR THEIR OFFSPRING OR BECAUSE THEY (THE MALES) WILL DIE SOON OR GO TO JAIL). SO TO MAKE THE MOST OF THIS UNSTABLE AND UNPREDICTABLE r-selected ENVIRONMENT THEY PURSUE A FAST LIFE HISTORY AND SEXUALLY PROMISCUOUS MATING STRATEGY, WHICH ALLOWS THEM TO PLACE THEIR EGGS IN MANY BASKETS, SO TO SPEAK! (IF MALES ARE GOING TO BE IN~N~OUT OF YOUR LIFE IT'S BEST TO PLAY THE FIELD AND HOPEFULLY GET IMPREGNATED BY THE MALE WITH THE BEST GENES. ON THE OTHER HAND, IF MALES ARE GOING TO BE COMMITTED AND LOYAL TO YOU IT'S BETTER TO FIND THE ONE THAT HAS THE MOST RESOURCES (AND THAT ONE TYPICALLY HAS THE MOST FATHERLY LIKE QUALITIES) AND STICK WITH THAT ONE.)
"I Heard They Come To Pay~N~Play Not To Stay!" Ralo Da PiiiiiimP!
That's What I Heard, P.
p. 298 ONWARD Will Explain Why Prostitution Is A Viable Solution For Women (A Solution To Their Reproductive And Wealth Related Goals).
READ ABOUT HAWAII'S r-SELECTED ENVIRONMENT IN THE LINKS BELOW.
Life history strategy (composite of life expectancy, infant mortality, teen pregnancy, birth rate) differs across geographies (e.g., temperature, rainfall, parasite burden), suggesting ecological selective pressures contribute to variance in LH strategy.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/beautiful-minds/201009/life-in-the-fast-lane-part-vi-consilience-pop-culture-and-modern-living
Even within geographic regions, there is dramatic variability in terms of the ecology in which children are raised. Still, there are patterns. Areas that are more safe and stable (such as many reasonably high socioeconomic suburban areas) tend to be more conducive to people holding resources and long-term planning. These environments tend to be more patrilineal, with wealth being passed on through male lines and males controlling more of the resources (this is just the way things have been, but that certainly doesn't mean greater gender equality in earning potential isn't possible or desirable). The inhabitants of these environments encourage females to choose long-term mates based on their ability to invest in children, with wealth being one of the main indicators of "resource earning potential". Under these conditions, female promiscuity is looked down upon and females are more likely to receive derogatory labels for their sexually promiscuous behaviors. Also females value paternal certainty more in these environments since the male is likely to stay alive and take care of their children.
Many people living in these environments, which are more conductive to using K-selected strategies, may find it difficult to imagine circumstances in which it may be adaptive to live more of the fast life. There are, however, many areas in the world where the environments are more conducive to an r-selected strategy. And there are even entire societies around the world that are conducive to an r-selected strategy. In fact, most of the environments our ancestors evolved were more conducive to living the fast life.
Even within geographic regions, there is dramatic variability in terms of the ecology in which children are raised. Still, there are patterns. Areas that are more safe and stable (such as many reasonably high socioeconomic suburban areas) tend to be more conducive to people holding resources and long-term planning. These environments tend to be more patrilineal, with wealth being passed on through male lines and males controlling more of the resources (this is just the way things have been, but that certainly doesn't mean greater gender equality in earning potential isn't possible or desirable). The inhabitants of these environments encourage females to choose long-term mates based on their ability to invest in children, with wealth being one of the main indicators of "resource earning potential". Under these conditions, female promiscuity is looked down upon and females are more likely to receive derogatory labels for their sexually promiscuous behaviors. Also females value paternal certainty more in these environments since the male is likely to stay alive and take care of their children.
Many people living in these environments, which are more conductive to using K-selected strategies, may find it difficult to imagine circumstances in which it may be adaptive to live more of the fast life. There are, however, many areas in the world where the environments are more conducive to an r-selected strategy. And there are even entire societies around the world that are conducive to an r-selected strategy. In fact, most of the environments our ancestors evolved were more conducive to living the fast life.
https://arkaimcity.tumblr.com/post/60544890080
The mating system in these societies will therefore allow for females to choose males based more on good-gene indicators associated with social status (e.g., physical attractiveness, charisma, humor, intelligence, creativity, health; see Kaufman, Kozbelt, Bromley, & Miller, 2008) than wealth and indicators of the ability to provide for children. This sexual freedom for females is even greater in harsh and unpredictable matrilineal societies where social status and resources are passed down through the female line. With less chances for paternal investment (since mortality is high), women don't need to have paternity certainty.
While agriculture was a huge game changer in terms of mating strategy because it allowed individuals to set up roots and use long-term planning for the first time, most of the environments in which our ancestors evolved weren't agricultural. Instead, they were hunter and gatherer societies where the inhabitants were constantly mobile and living under harsh and unpredictable circumstances. Since land and animals can't be passed on to children in these environments (the environment is too unstable), it is social status (which can be passed down to children) and not material resources that is the scarce resource. In these societies it makes little difference whether social status is passed on through the mother or father (Hrdy, 1999). These societies tend to be more egalitarian since there is less reason to stratify individuals on an economic basis.
The mating system in these societies will therefore allow for females to choose males based more on good-gene indicators associated with social status (e.g., physical attractiveness, charisma, humor, intelligence, creativity, health; see Kaufman, Kozbelt, Bromley, & Miller, 2008) than wealth and indicators of the ability to provide for children. This sexual freedom for females is even greater in harsh and unpredictable matrilineal societies where social status and resources are passed down through the female line. With less chances for paternal investment (since mortality is high), women don't need to have paternity certainty.
Mood ckuhz my pops get out this weekend...
"FAST, NIGGA, FAST!" - T.C. (Town & Country)
I don't really trust anyone nowadays to be honest ...
LACK OF TRUST! ANOTHER SIGN OF A FATHERLESS UPBRINGING! 
http://aepsociety.org/wordpress/?cat=20
"NIGGA WHAAAAAAT? I'M A HUSTLER BITCH! I LIKE THEM GET RICH NIGGAS, THEM HIT THE SWITCH NIGGAS...NIGGAS 'BOUT THE SEX AND WITCH BITCH TO HIT NEXT, WHILE I'M KICKIN' MY GAME AND COLLECT'N THEM CHECKS...TRIPLE X-RATED HOE...SHITTIN'...LIL DICKS ALWAYS RUNNIN' THEY MOUTH (ME) WHILE A BITCH IS BETTER OFF MASTURBATE AND BE OUT!...MARRY A BIG DICK...KRIS!" - Mrs. R O C (LOWER CLASS, GHETTO NIGGETTE WIT FOE KIDZ; A REAL GHETTO ASS KOONETTE SUMMARIZING THE FAST LIFE HISTORY, r-selected MATING STRATEGY THAT SHE (A REAL GHETTO ASS NIGGETTE) EMPLOYS!)
During the course of human evolution, natural and sexual selection sculpted and coordinated various mating tactics to make sure they didn't strategically interfere with one another. For example, risky, impulsive attempts at mating effort (i.e., seduction) may interfere with the careful, long-term planning that is beneficial for survival and long-term pair bonding. As a result, life history strategy predicts that various psychological traits will tend to cluster together in non-random adaptively coordinated ways. These clusters were selected and sculpted by evolution to maximize fitness within particular environments.
https://nicolasbaumards.org/history/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886917303987
https://twitter.com/taniaarline/status/969241847926226944
Since those at the low end of the K-selected spectrum (i.e., those living the fast life) focus on short-term gains at the expense of long-term costs, their core adaptive psychological traits should involve rebelliousness, risky behaviors, impulsivity, and a focus on mate quantity and reduced parental investment. Since those at the high end of the K-selected spectrum focus on the long-term, their core adaptive psychological traits should involve careful risk considerations, a preference for monogamy, high parental investment, and conformity of social rules.
"Live Fast, Die Young. That's My Choice." - Tina She
There is also research on the effects of total parental absence on the development of life history strategy. Since father absence is more common than mother absence, and shows higher cultural variability (there are "father-absent" and "father-present" societies but no consistent "mother-absent" societies), a particularly active area of investigation is the consequences of father absence on the development of an individual's life history strategy.
The behavioral and psychological correlates of having a father absent for girls run far and wide, tending to trigger traits and behaviors typical of the fast life such as rapid sexual development, increased fertility, lower adult attachment to romantic partners, greater levels of manipulative and exploitative attitudes, less parental care devoted to one's offspring, greater risk-taking behavior, higher incidence of affective disorders, social aggression, sexual promiscuity, and preference for sexual variety.
A dangerous and uncertain environment, on the other hand, will trigger the fast life, involving earlier reproduction, higher mating effort, and less parental investment. According to evolutionary logic (a strictly genes-eye perspective), if a girl's father doesn't invest in her care, then maybe other males will act just the same and therefore it is evolutionarily adaptive to not count on men as long-term providers and instead employ a short-term mating strategy.
The behavioral and psychological correlates of having a father absent for girls run far and wide, tending to trigger traits and behaviors typical of the fast life such as rapid sexual development, increased fertility, lower adult attachment to romantic partners, greater levels of manipulative and exploitative attitudes, less parental care devoted to one's offspring, greater risk-taking behavior, higher incidence of affective disorders, social aggression, sexual promiscuity, and preference for sexual variety.
A dangerous and uncertain environment, on the other hand, will trigger the fast life, involving earlier reproduction, higher mating effort, and less parental investment. According to evolutionary logic (a strictly genes-eye perspective), if a girl's father doesn't invest in her care, then maybe other males will act just the same and therefore it is evolutionarily adaptive to not count on men as long-term providers and instead employ a short-term mating strategy.
WHY DO GIRLS WHO COME FROM FATHERLESS OR BROKEN HOMES REACH PUBERTY EARLY AND TEND TO LIVE LIFE IN THE FAST LANE (THE FAST TRACK); HAVE SEX EARLIER, HAVE CHILDREN EARLIER, ETC.?
- https://twitter.com/brandimarie4455/status/850838300998770688/photo/1AUGUST WAS MOST LIKELY FATHERLESS AND BASED ON HER WEIGHT AT DEATH (SHE BEING OVERWEIGHT FOR HER HEIGHT AND AGE) SHE PROBABLY REACHED PUBERTY (MENARCHE) AT AN EARLY AGE AND THIS EARLY MENARCHE WITH ITS ACCOMPANYING HORMONAL AND NEUROLOGICAL CHANGES RESULTED IN HER RECKLESS BEHAVIOR (DRINKING AND DRUGGING) AND PRECOCIOUS SEXUAL ACTIVITY AS WELL AS HER EARLY DEATH!
AUGUSTUS!("Step-Daddy All In Her Room!" - Mr. Free)("Fuck Around And Turn Into A Step-Daddy!" - Da Gunman)
The behavioral and psychological correlates of having a father absent for girls run far and wide, tending to trigger traits and behaviors typical of the fast life such as rapid sexual development, increased fertility, lower adult attachment to romantic partners, greater levels of manipulative and exploitative attitudes, less parental care devoted to one's offspring, greater risk-taking behavior, higher incidence of affective disorders, social aggression, sexual promiscuity, and preference for sexual variety.Framing the effects of parental absence on life history strategy in an evolutionary context, Belsky et al. (1991) and Chisholm (1993) argue that children in the first few years of life use their level of attachment security as a cue of risk and uncertainty, and this then influences the development of their reproductive strategy. A safe and predictable environment (neighborhood, social, and parental) will trigger a slower reproductive strategy, with a focus on later reproduction and high parenting effort. A dangerous and uncertain environment, on the other hand, will trigger the fast life, involving earlier reproduction, higher mating effort, and less parental investment. According to evolutionary logic (a strictly genes-eye perspective), if a girl's father doesn't invest in her care, then maybe other males will act just the same and therefore it is evolutionarily adaptive to not count on men as long-term providers and instead employ a short-term mating strategy.
“according to numerous measures, those with tattoos, especially visible ones, are more short-sighted and impulsive than the non-tattooed...Even the expressed intention to get a tattoo predicts increased short-sightedness” sciencedirect.com/science/articl
