88 Couldn't Recognize The Game Witta Telescope - Sillie Sida
What do the majority of the 87.79% of Hawaiians supporting the anti-Mauna Kea movement have in common? They have in common the fact that their decision to support it isn't based on an unprejudiced, dispassionate assessment of the matter (understanding the purpose of the TMT, being aware of the precautions (safety and environmental measures) taken to construct and operate it, weighing its pros and cons), but rather on an instinctual and emotion laden drive to side with and signal their belonging to their in-group (their anti-American, anti-capitalist, anti-Western intellectual, Native Hawaiian in-group).
A desire to signal one's ethnic identity and political identity combined with a need for one's ideology to be socially and sexually appealing are the basis for Native Hawaiian, anti-TMT demonstrations.
Humans are a hyper-cooperative species—more so than any other animal species. We engage in highly complex and coordinated group activities with non-kin and comply without resistance to requests from complete strangers. Rather than falling apart or running amuck when disaster strikes, research shows that most humans are calm, orderly, and work together to help others. During times of extreme crisis, we forget about our individual differences, backgrounds, and beliefs and unite together for a common cause (e.g., ask anyone closely involved in the 9/11 crisis in New York City the extent they were worried about whether the person they were helping was homeless or a millionaire, religious or atheist, Black or white).
A core component of this evolutionary advantage involved the development of complex social-signaling capabilities that allowed for a quick and safe means to evaluate/resolve conflict and manage potential collaborations. Indeed, our social signaling capacities are more powerful than most individuals realize as they viscerally impact not only the person we are interacting with but our own physiology as well—most often at the pre-conscious level. Slow-motion film analysis has robustly revealed that we react to changes in body movement, posture, and facial expressions of others during interactions without ever knowing it. Indeed, we are constantly social-signaling when around others (e.g., via micro-expressions, body movements)—even when deliberately trying not to. For example, "silence" can be just as powerful as "non-stop talking."
Plus, for our very early ancestors living in harsh environments, the cost of not detecting a "true" disapproval signal was too high to ignore—since tribal banishment was essentially a death sentence from starvation or predation (see Lonely Apes Die). As a consequence, we are constantly scanning the facial expressions and vocalizations of other people for signs of disapproval and are biologically predisposed to construe the intentions of others as disapproving—especially when social signals are ambiguous. This means we are essentially a socially-anxious species. Blank expressions, furrowed brows, or slight frowns are often interpreted as disapproving—regardless of the actual intentions of the sender (e.g., some people frown or furrow their brow when intensely listening). Moreover, being rejected by a tribe hurts—research shows that social ostracism triggers the same areas of the brain that are triggered when we experience physical pain (Eisenberger & Lieberman, 2004). Thus, we fear the pain of social exclusion and our emotional well-being is highly dependent on the extent we feel part of a tribe and socially connected.
I can't think of a single major group of people anywhere who are more poorly adapted to western civilization than Australian aborigines.
I CAN THINK OF ONE. I THINK PEOPLE WITH A LOT OF HAWAIIAN DNA (50% OR MORE) ARE POORLY ADAPTED TO MODERN HAWAII (TECHNOLOGICALLY AND SOCIALLY ADVANCED HAWAII). WHY? BECAUSE TO HAVE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUCCESS IN MODERN HAWAII YOU HAVE TO HAVE ABOVE AVERAGE INTELLIGENCE, LOW TIME-PREFERENCE (ABILITY TO DELAY GRATIFICATION AND PLAN AHEAD), AGREEABLENESS AND OPENNESS (ABILITY TO ACCEPT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND GET ALONG WITH PEOPLE WITHOUT BEING CLOSE-MINDED, OBSTINATE, AND HOSTILE) AND INDUSTRIOUSNESS (ABILITY TO WORK LONG HOURS) AND HAWAIIANS WITH A LOT OF HAWAIIAN DNA SEEM TO BE LACKING IN THESE GENETIC TRAITS. THAT IS, THEY TEND TO HAVE A LOWER IQ, THEY TEND TO BE IMPULSIVE AND NOT PLAN FOR THE FUTURE, THEY TEND TO BE INDOLENT (LACK A DESIRE TO WORK LONG HOURS) AND TEND TO BE SUSPICIOUS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND HOSTILE TOWARDS PROMOTERS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. WHY DO SO FEW HAWAIIANS WITH 50% OR MORE HAWAIIAN DNA HOLD HIGH STATUS POSITIONS IN MODERN HAWAIIAN SOCIETY? YOU HARDLY SEE ANY POLITICIANS THAT HAVE 50% OR MORE HAWAIIAN DNA, YOU HARDLY SEE ANY JUDGES WITH 50% OR MORE HAWAIIAN DNA, YOU HARDLY SEE ANY DOCTORS OR SURGEONS THAT HAVE 50% OR MORE HAWAIIAN DNA, YOU HARDLY SEE ANY SCIENTISTS OR ACADEMICIANS WITH 50% OR MORE HAWAIIAN DNA, YOU HARDLY SEE ANY HIGH RANKING MILITARY PERSONNEL WITH 50% OR MORE HAWAIIAN DNA, YOU HARDLY SEE ANY HIGH STATUS BUSINESS EXECUTIVES WITH 50% OR MORE HAWAIIAN DNA, ETC. WHY? BECAUSE THEY'RE LACKING IN THE GENETIC TRAITS THAT I STATED ABOVE AND COME FROM A CULTURE THAT DOESN'T STRESS CONFORMING TO THE STANDARDS OF MAINSTREAM SOCIETY BY SUCCEEDING IN SCHOOL AND SUCCEEDING IN THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SECTORS OF SOCIETY. (I THINK THIS SAME GENETIC MALADAPTEDNESS HAS LED TO THE OBESITY EPIDEMIC AMONG THE NATIVE POPULATION. I THINK THE NATIVES THAT HAVE 50% OR MORE HAWAIIAN DNA ARE GENETICALLY MALADAPTED TO THE ABUNDANCE AND TYPES OF FOODS IN THIS MODERN ENVIRONMENT. I DON'T KNOW. MAYBE I'M MAKING THIS STUFF UP!
J. Kēhaulani Kauanui is Professor of American Studies Hey, I Think I Found One! A Native Professor! (The Elizabeth Warren Of Native Hawaiian Academia!)
I THINK HAWAIIANS HAVE A VICTIM MINDSET, AN OVERSIZED SENSE OF ENTITLEMENT, AND FEELINGS OF ENVY TOWARD WHITES JUST LIKE NIGGERS ON THE CONTIGUOUS 48 STATES. THAT IS, LIKE NIGGER CULTURE, HAWAIIAN CULTURE HAS CULTIVATED A "YOU OWE ME, YOU NEED TO MAKE AMENDS FOR YOU ANCESTORS, WHITEY" MINDSET AMONG HAWAIIANS. AND IT'S THIS MINDSET THAT PREVENTS THE NATIVES FROM ATTAINING THE SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC SUCCESS THAT THEY COULD ACHIEVE IN THIS MODERN SOCIETY. (LIFE IS INHERENTLY UNFAIR. NO ONE DESERVES ANYTHING OR IS ENTITLED ANYTHING. YOU JUST HAVE TO MAKE THE BEST OF YOUR LIFE WITH THE GENES YOU WERE BORN WITH AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES YOU WERE BORN INTO. MA DADDY NEVER TOLD ME NUTTIN' LIKE THIS, BUT I BELIEVE HE BELIEVES SOMETHIN' LIKE THIS! WHY YOU THINK HE WAS A REPUBLICAN?)
I THINK THIS STATISTIC IS MISLEADING BECAUSE THE EXPECTED INCREASE IN THE NATIVE POPULATION WON'T BE AMONG FULL-BLOODED HAWAIIANS OR EVEN HAWAIIANS WITH 50% HAWAIIAN DNA. IT'll LIKELY BE AMONG PEOPLE WITH 25% HAWAIIAN DNA OR LESS. SO, THEY'LL LOOK MOSTLY WHITE OR MOSTLY ASIAN OR MOSTLY FILIPINO OR MOSTLY SAMOAN, BUT THEY'LL BE CONSIDER PART OF THE NATIVE HAWAIIAN POPULATION BOOM BECAUSE THEY HAVE A SLIVER OF HAWAIIAN DNA (25% OR LESS). PLUS,THE CENSUS TAKERS DON'T DO DNA TESTING, SO MANY OF THESE FUTURE "HAWAIIANS" COULD CLAIM THAT THEY'RE HAWAIIAN WHEN IN ACTUALITY THEY HAVE NO HAWAIIAN DNA WHATSOEVER.
I THINK A LOT OF THE KANAKAS ARE ANTI-AMERICAN, ANTI-SCIENCE, ANTI-ADVANCED CIVILIZATION FOR A REASON AND THE REASON IS THAT THEY'RE INDOCTRINATED (BRAINWASHED) FROM AN EARLY AGE (ASKEIKIS) INTO BELIEVING MYTHS ABOUT THEIR ORIGIN AND CULTURE AND OTHER FALSEHOODS BY THEIR KAPUNAS. LISTEN TO THE RESPECTED KAPUNA SPEW FAIRY TALE BELIEFS IN THE ABOVE LINK.
Our brains were shaped for fitness, not for truth. Sometimes truth is adaptive, but sometimes it is not. Conflicts of interest are inherent to the human condition, and we are apt to want our version of the truth, rather than the truth itself, to prevail
Some media say that to indigenous peoples sacredness is not just attached to a place. That it comes from a understanding of the world as a connected whole.Sounds like a bunch of colors of the wind talk.The problematic use of the Nobel Native Savage tropes in so much media about this aside…what could be more connected than carefully studying the stars and understanding what connects us to them. We are star stuff. Every atom other than hydrogen. Most of what you are made of what the planet is made of… came from the hearts of long dead stars. Ever metal in your body was forged by nuclear fusion. That’s sacred. There is no better place to study that than Mauna Kea. There would be no better way to honor that than through astronomy, cosmology, and astrophysics.
Argument from Nativity and Sacredness is Just Nonsense.
In the Kapu system, which was in full force until 1819 when the Native Hawaiian monarchy abolished it
Think this isn’t a factor. Notice how much the protestors mention mana. The Kapu system is part of the native Hawaiian belief system, abolished in 1819 by king Kamehameha II.They are claiming that the mountaintop is sacred in some part based on a set of beliefs that was abolished by their own monarchy exactly 200 years ago!NONSENSE! Utter rubbish being manipulatively used.
The sacred restrictions on people traveling to the summit of volcanos like Mauna Kea were abolished by the natives themselves long before annexation. [1, 2]. That and so far, Pele does not seem to mind telescopes at the summit of one of her volcanos. If one is a true believer in the sacredness of that land one must believe in the gods that make is sacred. So far they seem to be pleased. *
There is no single current Hawaiian Kingdom government, not even an unrecognized one, with full authority to speak for Native Hawaiians, and grant or deny permission to build anything.(There are 12 groups that pretend to do so see here, and here, and here for a few examples)
I THINK THE MAJORITY OF THESE PEOPLE HAVE NO HAWAIIAN DNA AND THOSE THAT DO HAVE SO LITTLE THAT IT'S PHYSICALLY INDISCERNIBLE (THEIR FACIAL AND BODILY PHENOTYPE WOULD LEAD YOU TO BELIEVE THAT THEY'RE ASIAN OR WHITE OR RACIALLY AMBIGUOUS). BUT DON'T TELL ANY OF THEM THIS BECAUSE THEY'LL DENY IT AND LITERALLY FIGHT IT (FIGHT THE TRUTH ABOUT THEIR RACIAL MAKEUP) TO THEIR DEATH. IN FACT THEY'LL SAY, "WE HAWAIIAN CUZ...WE GET
PLENTY OF US CUZ..." (OR HOWEVER THEY SPEAK THEIR GIBBERISH) EVEN THOUGH THEY LOOK LIKE A MELANGE OF COLORS, SHAPES, FEATURES (FACIAL FEATURES), AND SIZES!
bitch adjacent- PROTECT MAUNA KEA@angelcurlsss2h2 hours ago I'm going to a party for Kainoa's Hawaiian side, lets hope I don't see anyone from my family there AND THEY'RE ALL RELATED TO ONE ANOTHER, BUT THE MAJORITY OF THESE RELATIVES OF THEIRS AREN'T BIOLOGICALLY RELATED TO THEM. THEY'RE JUST FICTIVE KIN, WHICH IS ANOTHER SIGN THAT MODERN, NATIVE HAWAIIAN CULTURE IS MATRILINEAL BASED. NO WONDER THE KEIKIS ARE ENCOURAGED TO CALL EVERYONE "AUNTY" AND "UNCLE"; THEY'RE ALL OHANA.
I THINK MOST PEOPLE WHO HAVE HAWAIIAN DNA WOULD HAVE A FAMILY TREE SIMILAR TO THE GIRL'S ABOVE. THAT IS, IT WOULD TAKE MOST PEOPLE WITH HAWAIIAN DNA LIVING TODAY AT LEAST 4 GENERATIONS TO TRACE BACK TO A FULL-BLOODED HAWAIIAN ANCESTOR (A FULL-BLOODED HAWAIIAN MALE OR FEMALE LIVING IN THE EARLY 1900s) AND FROM THAT POINT ON THAT ANCESTRY WOULD BECOME DILUTED* EACH GENERATION, JUST AS IT HAS IN THE GIRL'S LINEAGE ABOVE, UNTIL YOU REACH A POINT WHERE PEOPLE ARE RUNNING AROUND WITH HARDLY ANY HAWAIIAN DNA, BUT CLAIMING TO BE AS HAWAIIAN AS IT GETS LIKE YOU SEE TODAY!
*I THINKIT BECOMES MORE ASIAN OR WHITE LOOKING AS THE GENERATIONS PASS!
The Family Tree Starts Out Hawaiian Looking (See The Portraits), But Over The Generations Becomes More White, East Asian, Filipino, And UGLY Looking!
Native Hawaiians Are Breeding Themselves Into Extinction* (Non-Existence) And Being Outbred In Their Native Land By Whites, East Asians, Filipinos, Tongans, Samoans, Micronesians And The Mongrelized Offspring Of These Unions.
*HOW DO YOU BREED YOURSELF INTO OBLIVION? BY CONTINUING TO BREED WITH PEOPLE THAT HAVE LITTLE TO NO HAWAIIAN DNA AND BY ALLOWING YOUR DESCENDANTS TO BREED WITH PEOPLE THAT HAVE LITTLE TO NO HAWAIIAN DNA, YET CONSIDERING YOURSELF AND ALL OF YOUR DESCENDANTS AS BEING NATIVE HAWAIIAN! DON'T YOU GET IT?
Now, it is not just awakened Whites who have concerns about who is one of them and who isn't.Many American Indian tribes have elaborate ways of determining who is one of them and who isn't and many use the blood quantum idea in which some consider someone with as little as 1/32nd blood quantum (which means just one gggg grandparent) to be an Indian and one of their tribe.Such a low standard is an indication of just how much American Indian blood has been watered down via miscegenation.In fact, so watered down have many American Indian genomes become that it is not unusual to find blond, blue-eyed "American Indians." As you know, blond hair and blue-eyes are not the result of American Indian genes.
Many Native Hawaiians are also concerned about who is a Native Hawaiian and who isn't, and miscegenation in Hawaii has reduced the pure Hawaiians down to such a tiny fraction of the population thatmany mixed race Hawaiians are now being considered Native Hawaiians when in fact they really aren't.But, this is what happens when miscegenation starts destroying a particular genome and transforming it into something else.
"The Hawaiians are doing the same thing.Seems that it's difficult these days to find any Hawaiians who are truly more than 50% Hawaiian. Yup. They've been so blended that even the so-called native Hawaiians are mostly not very native and not very Hawaiian.
"How many more generations of blending will it take to completely wipe them out, man? Not many. The Hawaiians started toward extinction in 1778--a mere 229 years ago--when Captain James Cook arrived in the islands bringing diseases that the Hawaiians had no resistance to, and sailors who mated with the Hawaiian women.
Let this process go on long enough and swamp the islands with alien genes and eventually you might end up with blue-eyed, blond haired "Native Hawaiians," who look like Scandinavians but who may have Native Hawaiian names. Are they really Native Hawaiians? Of course not. At least not in the historic genetic sense. The Native Hawaiians were absorbed into a different genotype and became extinct.
WHAT HAWAIIANS ONCE LOOKED LIKE VERSUS WHAT THEY NOW LOOK LIKE. AND THE GUY TO THE LEFT MAY NOT EVEN BE FULL-BLOODED. HE LOOKS A LIL FLIP OR CHINK TO ME!
Natives With No Understanding Of Evolution And The Genetic Role You Play In It, Read Below!
Our Genographic team learned some key pieces of information that helped us gain more insight into the peopling of the Caribbean. Most surprisingly, we found that roughly 60% of Puerto Ricans carry maternal lineages of Native American origin. Native American ancestry, higher than nearly any other Caribbean island, originated from groups migrating to Puerto Rico from both South and Central America. Analysis of the Y Chromosome DNA found that no Puerto Rican men (0%) carried indigenous paternal lineages, while more than 80% were West Eurasian (or European)
This leads us to conclude that the Y chromosomes (inherited strictly paternally) of Tainos were completely lost in Puerto Rico, whereas the mitochondrial DNA (inherited strictly maternally) survived long and well. This stark difference has been seen in other former colonies (Brazil, Cuba, Jamaica), but the gender dichotomy appears strongest in the Spanish-speaking Americas. A look into the rest of the Puerto Rican genome using the Genographic Project’s custom genotyping tool, the GenoChip, sheds some light on what may have happened during Spanish colonial times to create this ancestral imbalance.
The average Puerto Rican individual carries 12% Native American, 65% West Eurasian (Mediterranean, Northern European and/or Middle Eastern) and 20% Sub-Saharan African DNA. To help explain these frequencies in light of the maternal and paternal differences, I used basic math and inferred that it would take at least three distinct migrations of hundreds of European men each (and practically no European women) to Puerto Rico, followed by intermixing with indigenous women. It also would necessitate the complete decimation of indigenous men (but not women), to account for those numbers. These results are surprising and also shed light into a dark colonial past that, until now, had remained somewhat unclear.
About 90% of Puerto Rican Y DNA is Spanish. It also looks like something around 70-90% of their mtDNA is Native American. It makes sense because 90% of Spanish colonist were male, so their only option was to marry Native women. African input on mtDNA and Y DNA looks equal, which would make sense if a similar amount of African men and women slaves were brought to Puerto Rico.
"4,000 to 8,000 years after humanity invented agriculture, 17 women reproduced for every one man...In more recent history, as a global average, about four or five women reproduced for every one man."
"In most extant human societies, successful men routinely convert high status and power into monopolization of multiple women. It follows that males at the other end of the scale are likelier than females to suffer complete reproductive failure" https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016230958590041X?via%3Dihub
ONLY MALES POSSESS A Y-CHROMOSOME AND THIS Y-CHROMOSOME IS PASSED FROM GREAT-GRANDFATHER TO GRANDFATHER TO FATHER TO SON TO GRANDSON, ETC. THIS Y-CHROMOSOME CORRESPONDS WITH THE ETHNICITY OF ONE'S LAST NAME (e.g. HAWAIIAN LAST NAME CORRESPONDS WITH A HAWAIIAN Y-CHROMOSOME), BUT IN THE CASE OF ADOPTIONS OR STEP-SONS OR FABRICATED LAST NAMES (FABRICATED LAST NAMES LIKE YOU FIND IN HAWAII) THIS Y-CHROMOSOME - LAST NAME CORRESPONDENCE WON'T MATCH (e.g. THE HAWAIIAN LAST NAME WON'T MATCH TO THE EAST ASIAN OR FILIPINO OR EUROPEAN Y-CHROMOSOME, SO THESE HAWAIIANS ARE USING FALSE LAST NAMES).
What Full-Blooded Hawaiians Looked Like. Note The Absence Of East Asian, Southeast Asian (Filipino), And European Features.
What A Face Composed Of A Lot Of Hawaiian DNA Looks Like. Note The Lack Of Asian Features.
Why Do I Believe These Last Names Are The Actual Last Names Of The 2 Males In The Twitter Accounts Above? because The Patriarchs Or Descendants Of The Patriarchs Left These Islands Before Hawaiian Culture Became Matrilineal (Tracing Descent Through The Mother's Lineage).
IF A GENETICIST WERE TO DO A DNA TEST ON THE REMAINING PART NATIVE HAWAIIANS ON THESE ISLANDS I SUSPECT THAT THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF THE POPULATION WOULD BE SIMILAR TO THAT OF PUERTO RICANS IN THE SENSE THAT THEIR Y-CHROMOSOMES WOULD MOSTLY COME FROM EUROPEAN OR ASIAN MALES SINCE THE MAJORITY OF FULL-BLOODED HAWAIIAN MALES DIDN'T HAVE GREAT REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS AFTER EUROPEAN CONTACT WHILE THEIR MITOCHONDRIAL DNA WOULD PRIMARILY COME FROM PART HAWAIIAN FEMALES*. TO PUT IT ANOTHER WAY, THE MAJORITY OF LIVING PART HAWAIIANS LIKELY GET THEIR HAWAIIAN DNA FROM A FEMALE ANCESTOR RATHER THAN A MALE ANCESTOR JUST AS PUERTO RICANS GET THEIR NATIVE INDIAN DNA (TAINO DNA) FROM A FEMALE RATHER THAN A MALE. WHY? BECAUSE WHEN MALES CONQUER A FOREIGN PEOPLE AND COLONIZE A FOREIGN LAND THEY TYPICALLY KILL OFF OR SUPRESS AND SUBJUGATE THE MALES NATIVE TO THAT LAND LEADING THEM (THE INVADING MALES) TO HAVE SOLE ACCESS TO THE NATIVE WOMEN. THIS IS WHY I BELIEVE THE MAJORITY OF HAWAIIAN SURNAMES IN USE TODAY AREN'T THE ACTUAL SURNAMES OF THE PEOPLE USING THEM (THE HAWAIIAN Y-CHROMOSOME CORRESPONDING TO THAT SURNAME WOULDN'T BE FOUND IN THE CARRIER OF THAT SURNAME).
PEOPLE HERE ARE JUST CREATING SURNAMES FOR THEMSELVES AND USING THEM.
Most likely due to male warfare, large groups of men being killed. Winning groups capturing women and losing groups left with fewer men. When sex ratios are highly skewed then polygyny and extra-pair mating will be more common.
Knowing the history of Polynesia, this is not difficult to explain. The Europeans who first visited the Polynesian islands were all men.There simply were no female explorers or whalers or sailors or traders or missionaries; so the arrival of Europeans made no impact whatsoever on the mDNA gene pool of modern Polynesians. As for the prevalence of European Y-chromosomes, if we had no idea of the history of the islands we might imagine this to be the echo of a past military invasion led by men, which would produce a large influx of Y-chromosomes but not of mDNA. But that isn't quite what happened in Polynesia. European men often needed little persuasion to jump ship, and in most cases they were made welcome. In the Cook Islands at least it was not uncommon for mothers to encourage their daughters to marry European men, even bringing them from the outlying islands to Rarotonga specifically for that purpose.
Polynesia changed completely after the arrival of the Europeans. New infectious diseases swept through the susceptible islanders. Social structures crumbled as the old religions were swept away by aggressively evangelical missionaries. It is a familiar story, repeated time and again across the world. But suspend your disapproval for a moment to look at what we had found from a purely genetic point of view. Consider the European arrivals as a case of boy meets girl - or, more specifically, of sperm meets egg. The European ships brought sperm from the other side of the world to fertilize the eggs of Polynesian women, rather than the other way round. There were no European eggs on board - they had all stayed at home. Was sexual selection at work there? The European sperm must have found its way to the Polynesian eggs somehow, either by force or by consent. The records of Polynesian mothers bringing their daughters from the outer islands to marry Europeans suggests at least some degree of female choice, if only by their mothers. What had these new men got to offer that their Polynesian rivals hadn't? These men were not rich by European standards at home, but on Rarotonga they had wealth and status on their side and, as a result, their sperm found eggs to fertilize. Female choice, the engine of sexual selection, was selecting features familiar to us all.
What of the genes themselves? Which were the winners and which were the losers in this exchange? That is an easy question to answer. The clear winners were the European Y-chromosomes. They had displaced the original Polynesian Y-chromosomes in a third of Rarotongan men. European mDNA had got nothing out of this trade at all; it was nowhere to be seen. Polynesian mDNA, on the other hand, had neither flourished nor suffered from the arrival of the Europeans. It had just carried on, blissfully unconcerned by the battle being fought between the Y-chromosomes. A genetic cynic might even say that the whole European exploration of the Pacific had been organized for the benefit of European Y-chromosomes.
The genetic effect of European colonization in Polynesia has been repeated in many different parts of the world. (Adam's Curse)
Here's
A Short Story That I've Previously Shared With You All That I'd Like To
Share Again. Tami (David's Girlfriend In The 90s) Was Working At
Walt's Wharf In The Early 90s. She Was A Waitress There And Was Serving A
Table When She Overheard A Voice From Another Table That Sounded
Familiar. It Was A Loud, Booming Voice With Similarly Sounding Loud,
Booming Laughter. When Tami Got A Chance She Asked The Male (Who Was
Emitting That Sound) If He Were A Dagampat. He Responded With Something
Along The Lines Of "No, But I'm Related To Some." The Male Turned Out To
Be Curtis Kekoa And He Was In Southern California Visiting Friends. The
Astonishing Thing About This Story Is That Tami Had Never Met Curtis Or
Even Known That He Existed (She Had Never Seen Him Or Heard Of Him
Prior To That Encounter). Yet, She Was Able To Recognize A Voice And
Laugh (A Voice And Laugh That Was Eerily Similar To My Father's, My Aunt Lemomi's, And My Uncle Walter's) That
She'd Heard When Associating With US And Precisely Pinpointed It To
Another Relative Of Ours.
Hey Y'all, Let ME Let Y'all In On A Family Secret. Uncle Walter's Father Was Not Claudio Bagobe Dagampat (The Father Of My Father). Uncle Walter's Father Was Some Other Filipino Man That My Grandmother (Annie Kekoi**) Had A Child With (I Believe He Was Another Filipino Man Who Worked In The Cannery's In Alaska). How Do I Know This? Because Aunt Lollie (Uncle Walter's Wife) Told My Mother. So, Technically, Uncle Walter Was Not A Dagampat, But We (My Siblings And I) Never Knew That And We Always Treated Him As Such When He Was Alive. In Actuality, He, Like Uncle Curtis, Were Only Half Brothers With My Father And The Rest Of My Father's Siblings. (So You Only Share 12.5% Of Your Genes With Your Cousins, But Since Uncle Curtis And Uncle Walter Were Only 25% Related To My Father Their Children (My Cousins) Share Even Less Than 12.5% Of Their Genes With My Siblings And I. I Believe They Share 1/2 Of 12.5% Of Their Genes With Us, Which Is 6.25%. That's Not Much Maine!)
LOOK AT UNCLE CURTIS AND UNCLE WALTER! YOU CAN TELL THEY'RE NOT FULLY RELATED TO HIM!
I Was
At Pacific Palms's* Cima Restaurant In 2006 With My Father And Uncle Curtis
And Our Waiter Happened To Be Vietnamese. So My Uncle Curtis Told Him
That He Flew Missions Over The Mekong DeltaAnd Other Specific Locations
In Vietnam (Locations That I've Forgotten The Names Of) And The
Vietnamese Waiter Laughed (Almost Sarcastically). The Vietnamese Waiter Couldn't Believe
It. He Didn't Think My Uncle Curtis Looked Old Enough To Have Been In
The Vietnam War, Nor Could He Imagine Him (My Uncle Curtis, An Asian Looking
Guy) Being A Fighter Pilot And Doing Air Raids On His Homeland, But I Think My Uncle Curtis Changed The Vietnamese Waiter's Mind Once He Started Speaking To Him In Vietnamese.
*WHO REMEMBERS SAMOAN TOM THAT PLAYED B-BALL AT THE UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE AND WORKED AT PACIFIC PALMS IN THE EARLY 2000s? I'LL SHARE A STORY ABOUT TOM LATER!
Here's A Perfect Example. The Man To The Left Is Half Chinese (His Hawaiian Mother Had Him With A Chinese Man Who He Never Met) And Was Left On Oahu To Be Raised By A Hawaiian Family (The Kekoa Family). So, His Actual Surname Is Chinese In Origin, But He Used The Surname Of The Hawaiian Family He Was Raised By (Kekoa) And Now His Family (His Children And Grandchildren Who Were Unaware Of He Being Chinese And Who Themselves Don't Know They're Chinese) Use This Surname As Well Even Though Their Genetics (Y-chromosome In Particular) Don't Match It! I Share This Story With You All Today Because I Think It's Representative Of The Majority Of Hawaiian Surnames In Use Today. That Is, The Majority Of Hawaiian Surnames In Use Don't Correspond With The Genetics Of Its Owner!
*FEMALES SEEK MALES WHO HAVE STATUS AND WEALTH AND ONCE EUROPEAN MALES AND LATER EAST ASIAN MALES BEGAN TO DOMINATE HAWAIIAN SOCIETY HAWAIIAN FEMALES READILY REPRODUCED WITH THEM.
Conan Chandler Of Hauula By Way Of Kaneohe Looks Very Similar To The Male In The Below Picture.
Observation #11: Many Of The Non-Hawaiian Polynesians (i.e. The Samoans And Tongans) Have Hawaiian 1st Names. Why? To Establish A Hawaiian Identity And Thus Differentiate Themselves From The Samoans And Tongans From Their Respective Homelands And From The SamoansAnd Tongans In The Mainland (California And Utah In Particular) As Well As Integrate And Ingratiate Themselves Among The Hawaiian Community. What Will This Lead To? Just More Breeding Between Samoan Males And Hawaiian Females And Tongan Males And Hawaiian Females Until 200 Years From Now You Have Predominantly Genetically Samoan And Predominantly Genetically Tongan MormonMales And Females With Hawaiian First And Last Names.
Kaimana finau original Hau’ula My Home
This Thought Came To ME As I Was Walking Down Kamehameha In Hauula And Stumbled Upon A Piece Of Mail Directed To Kaimana Finau. I'd Never Heard Of Nor Seen Kaimana, But I Imagined That He'd Look Tongan (I Later Returned That Piece Of Mail To The Post Office After Arguing With The Girl That Works There). As It Turns Out (After Now Just Googling His Name), He Could Pass For A White/Tonga/Hawaiian Admixture, Which Proves The Point I'm Making Above.
.jpg)
