52 If You Ain't Gettin' Money, Whatchu In It Foe?! - Showt Dawg
SHAKA KHAN, SHAKA KHAN, SHAKA KHAN, SHAKA KHAN!
"the greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy, drive him before you, to see his cities reduced to ashes, to see those who love him shrouded in tears, and to gather into your bosom his wives and daughters."...Khan and his male descendants conquered an area from the Sea of Japan to the Mediterranean, never wasting an opportunity to impregnate the women and girls of the vanquished villages. They also raped, married or sexually enslaved a phenomenal number of women. Genghis' grandson Kublai Khan, the emperor who welcomed Marco Polo to China, presided by day over the Mongol Empire at its greatest extent. By night he serviced a harem that housed 7000 women, methodically rotated through his bedroom at the time of their greatest fertility.
Immense wealth and power, passed on to male descendants, laid the foundation for the greatest genetic dynasty our species has ever produced...Men who waged war and sought conquest have long enjoyed high fitness. Men went to war with rape and pillage on top of the agenda, returning with some combination of wives, slaves and treasure...Violence is a consequence of polygamy, as well as a cause.(Sex, Genes, andRock 'N' Roll)
"the periodic exponential increase of a particular Y-chromosomal lineage and its sweep across a population...The most plausible explanation is...conquest,the extermination of local male elites and the rape and amassing of women in harems"
“Human beings have a natural impulse to hurt and dominate each other…But in our current society, you’re not allowed to just murder people, so we need another outlet for our aggression. That’s why people can take pleasure in ruining other people’s lives.”
Although Violent Competition For Mates Is No Longer Socially Sanctioned (Armed Larceny, Assault, Murder, Mayhem, Rape), In The Back Of The Mind Of All Males Is The Desire To Outcompete And Eliminate Rival Males To Gain Sexual Access To Those Male Rivals' Females (Their Wives, Their Girlfriends, Their Sisters, Their Daughters, Their Mothers, Their Lovers). Nowadays They Just Compete In Less Lethal Ways (Through Business, Politics, The Legal System, Academics, Sports, Etc.). (Keep This In Mind When You Scroll To The Bottom Of The Link Above And Read About The Eradication And Extermination Of The Hawaiian Y-Chromosome.)
"History is full examples in which kings dismissed or killed their most prominent advisers when these advisers were too competent and perceived as a threat...That is, these advisers might have kept their positions if their competence had been in doubt"
“wealth has only a trivial effect on happiness unless we have more than those around us, suggesting it is status and not money that we are really after"
"why do we continue working so hard? we're stuck in a rat race...a game of competitive signaling. No matter how fast the economy grows, there remains a limited supply of sex and status — and earning and spending money is still a good way to compete for it"
-Happiness increases with income
-Contrary to past studies, the relationship doesn't plateau at $75,000
-$$$ → sense of control over one's life → -Low earners are happier if they think money is unimportant, high earners if they think it's important
Today’s human population is descended from twice as many women as men, the single most underappreciated fact about gender. To get that difference, throughout the entire history of the human race, maybe 80% of women but only 40% of men reproduced.
Not long after the start of the Holocene, at the end of the last Ice Age and the onset of agriculture, there is evidence of a genetic bottleneck: Far fewer males than females were able to pass their DNA on. That ratio was as high as 1:17. Civilization discontented them.
Populations associated with the Yamnaya, a steppe culture from the around Black and Caspian Seas, swept through Europe, Siberia, and South Asia after around 3000 BCE. Indo-European languages accompanied their aDNA. Steppe lineages replaced as much as 90% of earlier male ancestry as far away as Britain by around the third millennium BCE. And on the Iberian Peninsula, by the second millennium, almost all Y chromosomes had been replaced by invaders with Steppe ancestry. Other inflows from the Steppe left their mark on the Indus, after about 2000 BCE, where from 50% to 90% of Y-chromosomal ancestry is of West Eurasian origin, and reflects the immigration of early Indo-Europeans.
Scheidel asks a simple question: “How did this happen?” And offers a simple answer. “It would seem hard to come up with a narrative that does not to some extent involve the violent takeover of resources and mates: accounts of war-chariots and warrior-culture.” He refers readers to the Rig Veda.
Steppe takeovers are hardly the end of the story. Mongol invasions, under Genghis and his descendant Khans, are famously supposed to have spread Y-chromosome star-clusters to as many as 8% of all late-21st-century Central Asian men.
And in the New World, European Y-chromosomes took over. Genetic studies have indicated the scale differential reproductive success. The male contribution to American Mestizos ranges from 50% to 80%; for women, the figure is closer to 90% Native American DNA. And in the United States, African-American ancestry is on average 73% African but 24% European.
130 Years Ago The White Man Devised A Child's Game That's Now Playing A Role In The Undermining Of His Authority And Unseating (Of His Position Of Power And Influence) In The Country He Created (The U.S.). How? By Allowing Low I.Q., Criminally InclinedNiggers To Gain Wealth, Status, Power, And Influence Through That Game. (Basketball Is Coming Back To Bite The White Man In The Ass!)
"Science classes are to be taught that Māori ‘Ways of Knowing’ have equal standing with ‘western’ science."
Some believe that teaching Māori children to read is an act of colonization. Solution? Imposed illiteracy? What would that be called?
on how Air New Zealand invokes Māori gods in their safety briefing: "Imagine if British Airways announced that their planes are kept aloft by the Holy Ghost in equal partnership with Bernoulli’s Principle and Newton’s First Law."
I CAN'T WAIT FOR THE DAY WHEN ULTRACONSERVATIVE WHITE AMERICANS RETAKE AMERICA AND EXPORT RAP, BASKETBALL, AND BLACKS TO AFRICA (FORCE BLACKS ONTO NAVAL SHIPS (8 TO A CABIN ALONG WITH A NERF BASKETBALL AND BASKET) AND SEND THEM BACK TO AFRICA WITH MICROPHONES (https://twitter.com/UsingLyft/status/1646270952471142407 EACH ONE GETS A MICROPHONE), BOOMBOXES, AND BASKETBALLS IN THEIR HANDS)!
The elongated Nilotics of South Sudan are rapidly improving at basketball, a game they seem born to play due to their once-famous height.
Headed south for the winter.
THEN DO THE SAME WITH SAMOANS, TONGANS, AND FOOTBALL (PACK THEM INTO CARGO PLANES (PACK 'EM IN LIKE SARDINES) AND SEND THEM BACK TO THE JUNGLE WITH BIBLES*, FOOTBALLS, A T00L BELT**, AND THE GAME OF FOOTBALL ON THEIR MINDS (THEY'LL HAVE THE BIBLE IN THEIR RIGHT HAND AND THE FOOTBALL IN THEIR LEFT HAND AS THEY PRESS AGAINST ONE ANOTHER IN THE CARGO PLANE WITH NOTHING ON BUT A TOOL BELT WITH TOOLS IN IT AROUND THEIR WAIST). ONCE THEY RETURN TO THE ISLANDS THEY CAN CLEAR SOME LAND AND HAVE AT IT (PLAY ALL THE FOOTBALL THEY WANT)!
If Weather Permits, I'd Have The Spades On Deck Of Battleships Looking Like This While The Admiral's At The Helm!
JT's Got The Right Idea! If You're A Brotha Or Sista Find You UH African Attorney That'll Find You African Land And Buy You Some African Land So That You Can Take Yourself Back To Africa With Your Entire Black African Fam!
THEY CAN RETURN TO THE TROPICAL AND SUBTROPICAL CLIMATE FROM WHICH THEY ORIGINATED AND BELONG TO SING, DANCE, PLAY INSTRUMENTS, PLAY SPORTS (BASKETBALL OR FOOTBALL, RESPECTIVELY), PRAISE JESUS (OR WHATEVER FICTIONAL DIETY THEY DEVISE) AND SMILE IN THE HOT SUN ALL DAY LONG!
*GIVE THEM A LITTLE TALK ABOUT A BLOND HAIRED, BLUE-EYED, PALE SKINNED, SEMITE NAMED HEY SUESS***(JESUS)WHO WANTS THEM TO RETURN TO THEIR HOMELANDS IN THE SOUTH PACIFIC TO BUILD CHURCHES AND CONVERT COETHNICS (FELLOW SOUTH PACIFIC SAVAGES) TO THE CHRISTIAN RELIGION.
**A T00L BELT WITH T00LS FOR HOME BUILDING, CHURCH BUILDING, LAND CLEARING (IATE WHICH COMES TO THEM NATURALLY).
***LET THEM KNOW IF THEY DO DO THAT (IF THEY DO RETURN TO THEIR RESPECTIVE MOTHERLANDS TO PROSELYTIZE)HEY SEUSSWILL TAKE CARE OF THEM (PROTECT THEM AND PROVIDE FOR THEM WHILE ON EARTH THEN ALLOW THEM TO JOIN HIM IN THEAFTERLIFE TO LIVE FOR ETERNITY)!
Standardized test were, and are, good at finding the bright kids, whether they come from money or not.
Getting rid of them eases the way for people with pull, which is why getting rid of them is happening.
Over The Past 10-15 Years I've Been Hearing About And Seeing (On Social Media) Black And Brown (Polynesian https://twitter.com/TiuAfalava/status/1522044274740654080****) High School Student Athletes With 4.0 And 4.5 And 5.0 GPAs And With Sports Scholarships To Prestigious Universities, However I Never Hear About These Same High Academic Athletes Pursuing Careers In High IQ Demanding Fields (Science, Technology, Education, Maths) When Their Professional Careers Don't Pan Out Or When They Choose Not To Pursue A Professional Career. Why Is That? Why Don't I Ever Hear About These High Academic High School Athletes Becoming Astrophysicists, Physicist, Chemists, Geologists, Archaeologists, Geneticists, Medical Practitioners (Doctors, Surgeons), Engineers, Etc.? Let ME Tell You Why. It's Likely Because High School GPA Isn't An Accurate Indication Of One's IQ And Intellectual Ability. What Is An Accurate Indication Of One's IQ And Intellectual Ability. The SAT And ACT! And I'm Fairly Sure That The Majority Of These High School Student Athletes With High GPAs Have Average To Below Average SAT And ACT Scores.
****For Instance, What Type Of Work Will This HAM0 Do Once His Football Playing Days Come To An End?
"Are low-income kids dumb?"
For reasons of nature and nurture, lower income kids are, on average, dumber than higher income kids.
Could Millennial high school students have thought they were smarter because they actually were smarter? No: SAT scores were unchanged or down between the 1990s (Gen X) and the 2000s (Millennials), as were scores on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) given to 12th graders. So academic performance was the same or worse, but self-views became more positive.
These ideas had to come from somewhere; teens didn't come up with them all on their own. One possible origin was high school students' grades. Because grades capture the feedback that students receive from teachers, they are more subjective than standardized tests, and more influenced by cultural trends in positive feedback. The academic equivalent of "everyone gets a trophy" is "everyone gets an A." So what did Millennials hear about their academic performance?
They were told, in short, that they were awesome. Continuing trends originating when late Gen X'ers were in school, the number of high school seniors with A averages soared, and the number with C averages plummeted among Millennial high school seniors (see Figure 5.7). This was also the era when parents began pressuring teachers to give high school students better grades, suggesting grade inflation wasn't just the teachers' idea.
Could students have been getting better grades because they were spending more time on homework? It was actually the opposite: Students in the 2000s spent less time on homework, with the number of 12th graders spending ten hours a week or more studying falling 24% between 1996 and 2006 (see the dashed line in Figure 5.7).
So, by the Millennial adolescence, the standard of thinking highly of yourself no matter what became part of the system: Teachers gave students better grades even though students were spending less time on homework. The boosting of empty self-esteem was no longer theoretical - it was real.
Students started thinking they were smarter than others not because their ability had improved or they were putting in more hours studying, but because Boomer adults had decided they need positive feedback. There were more A students not because more students mastered the material, but because parents and teachers decided to make more students feel like A students. (Generations)
Indians Are The Only Colored Student Athletes That Attend College On Sports Scholarships And Actually Become Scholars. Why? Because They Have Higher IQs, Come From Higher Socioeconomic Backgrounds (With College Educated Parents, Siblings, And Other Relatives), And Come From A Culture (Americanized South Asian Culture) That Values Academic Achievement And Whose Members Aspire To Professional Positions Of Prestige.
The beauty of selective legal immigration: Despite being a population that's less than a tenth of the Mexican-American population, and despite being relative newcomers to America, Indian-Americans are responsible for VASTLY more scientific and technological innovation.
After Prop. 209's passage, UC Berkeley, like the rest of the UC system, "went through a depression figuring out what to do," says Robert Laird, Berkley's propreferences admissions director from 1993 to 1999. The system's despair was understandable. It had relied on wildly unequal double standards to achieve its smattering of "underrepresented minorities," especially at Berkeley and UCLA, the most competitive campuses. The median SAT scores of blacks and Hispanics in Berkeley's liberal arts programs was 250 points lower (on a 1600-point scale) than that of whites and Asians. The test-score gap was hard to miss in the classroom. Renowned Berkeley philosophy professor John Searle, who judges affirmative action "a disaster," recounted that "they admitted people who could barely read."
...
The university as a whole started admitting all students in the top 4 percent of their high school class, regardless of their standardized test scores, hoping that this would net more applicants from all-minority schools. The public justification for this practice, which Texas and Florida also implemented in response to affirmative action bans, is that getting to the top of one's class signals the same academic talents regardless of whether your school awards As just for showing up. But a 2005 college board study found that 30 percent of the African American and Hispanic students with an A average have mediocre SAT verbal scores of 500 or lower. Indeed, while only half of the blacks and Hispanics who rank in the top tenth of their class also score over 600 on either section of the SAT, all the whites in the top 10 percent do. And contrary to the claims of affirmative action proponents, the evidence is strong that students with combined SAT scores of 1000, say, are less likely to do well in competitive colleges than students with test scores several standard deviations above that. In addition, UC also started giving preferences to students who had attended university-sponsored tutoring programs, which, while technically open to students of all races, targeted underrepresented minorities.
...
For several decades, the university had divided its applicants into two categories: It admitted one half only by objective tests of academic merit, such as standardized test scores and honors classes; it evaluated the other half subjectively, weighing such factors as race, economic status, or leadership. From this tier, where racial preferences had free rein, the vast majority of blacks and Hispanics were drawn.
After 209, the university could no longer use race within this second tier, and the surrogates for race it had developed netted a lower percentage of minorities from this tier than pure racial targeting. The solution? Junk the academic tier and evaluate the entire applicant pool on subjective and "contextual" factors. The hope, obviously, was that by eliminating the academic admits, the process would open up more space for students admitted on "holistic" factors - who just happened to be black and Hispanic.
UC president Richard Atkinson proposed in 2001 that all campuses adopt this new "comprehensive review" process. Under comprehensive review, already in use at diversity-mad Berkeley, perfect 1600 scores on the SATs would have to be understood "contextually." They might end up being given the same weight as 1100s, say, if the 1600-scoring student had come from a stable two-parent family and had attended a top high school. And the 900s on the SATs might count more than 1600s, if the students with the 900s came from a school with many low-achieving students or if he came from a single-parent home or spoke a foreign language at home. Admissions officers perked up when they read that a student lived in a gang area or had been shot. Tutors in UC outreach programs taught students to emphasize their social and economic disadvantages in their application essay.
Precious few faculty members in the UC system had the guts to oppose Atkinson's comprehensive-review proposal publicly (though a plurality of professors polled by Roper opposed preferences - in private, of course). Berkeley political scientist Jack Citrin was one of the few people who spoke out. Citrin observed that a UC Davis study showed that comprehensive review inevitably decreases the quality of the freshman class. Indeed, average SAT scores for entering freshman at Berkeley dropped from 1330 in 1998 to 1290 in 2001, according to USA Today, and the test-score gap between whites and Asians, on the one hand, and blacks and Hispanics, on the other hand, widened.
...
Comprehensive review gives university administrators a face-saving explanation for admissions disparities that appear racially motivated. In 2003, for example, John Moores Sr., who was the one remaining regent committed to color-blind meritocracy, disclosed that Berkeley had admitted 374 applicants in 2002 with SATs under 1000 - almost all of them "students of color" -while rejecting 3,218 applicants with scores above 1400. UCLA had similar admissions disparities. In a Forbes column, Moore, who had fought tooth and anil to get the data, accused Berkeley of continuing to discriminate against Asians and of admitting students who were unprepared for Berkeley's rigor.
Predictably, the administration exploded, engineering a censure resolution against Moores by his fellow regents. Backed up by a huge coalition of left-wing professors, civil rights groups, ethnic advocates, and opponents of standardized testing, administrators argued that the students admitted with extremely low scores had unique leadership skills or character and that their test scores said nothing about their ability to succeed at an elite institution. Race, they huffed, was irrelevant to their admission.
But the few independent studies that were published on admissions processes continued to show racial disparities that such "contextual factors" cannot explain away. A study of UCLA admissions from 1998 to 2001 - before the official onset of comprehensive review - showed that, even controlling for economic status and school ranking, blacks were 3.6 times as likely to be admitted as whites, and Hispanics 1.8 times as likely. An unpublished study of Berkeley Law School admissions by Richard Sander revealed disparities between minorities and whites of such magnitude that to posit any explanation other than race seems fanciful. The school assigns each applicant a numerical index based on college grades and LSAT scores. In 2002, it admitted 92 percent of white applicants with an index of 250 or higher but only 5 percent with an index between 235 and 239. By contrast, it admitted 75 percent of black applicants in the 235 to 239 range in 2002 and 65 percent in 2003. No black applicants had an index of 250 or higher. Even a 2004 university study acknowledge that there were admission disparities by race that nonacademic, nonracial factors could not account for.
Even if race were not motivating admissions decisions in violation of 209, it is ludicrous to imagine that it is a favor to let someone into an elite institution where most students scored much higher on the SATs. But preference advocates deny that standardized tests measure anything relevant about academic aptitude or preparedness. The standard line at UC is that "everyone whom we admit is highly qualified" - which just boils down to tautology: If we admit you, you are by definition highly qualified.
...
Affirmative action defenders have yet another explanation for the poor SAT performance of minorities. Low-income applicants from schools with underperforming student bodies, they contend, have never gotten the chance to develop their academic talents and so should not be held to the same standards. A 900 for them is the equivalent of a 1400 for a more privileged applicant. Colleges can compensate for deficiencies in K-12 education, said Rashid, "if you devise a process that identifies applicants with the willingness to succeed. Initially they need services, but by their third year, they're really screaming along." Yet while undoubtedly some ill-taught high school students end up trouncing their peers in college, such cases are not the norm. And colleges admissions have to be about averages.
The most radical preference advocates simply dismiss the validity of tests - for everyone. One UC report, for example, stressed that high school GPAs and standardized test scores combined predict only about 25 percent of freshman-year grades at the university - which, the authors imply, is a pathetically low predictive validity. Such objective measures, therefore, should give way to "holistic" factors for determining eligibility. But the 25-percent validity that they scorn in this case is higher than the correlation between SATs and socioeconomic status, which they invoke as a reason to discontinue the use of SATs in college admissions (SATs unfairly disadvantage the poor, goes the argument). If, as ex-Berkeley admissions director Laird put it, there is an "absolute correlation between income and SAT scores," then the correlation between SATs and academic performance is beyond absolute. By contrast, the factors that the 209 foes want to use instead of SATs for admission, such as "spark" and leadership, have predictive powers of about 2.5 percent - in other words, almost no relationship to academic success.
.
..
...As previously discussed, every selective college today admits black and Hispanic students with much weaker academic qualifications than those of white and Asian students, as any high school senior knows. At the University of Michigan, an Asian with the same GPA and SAT scores as the median black admit had zero chance in 2005 of admission; a white with those same scores had a 1-percent chance of admission. At Arizona State University, a white with the same academic credentials as the average black admit had a 2-percent chance of admission in 2006; that average black had a 96-percent chance of admission. The preferences continue into graduate and professional schools. From 2013 to 2016, medical schools nationally admitted 57 percent of black applicants with low MCATs of 24 to 26 but only 8 percent of whites and 6 percent f Asians with those same low scores, as Claremont McKenna College's Frederick Lynch reported in the New York Times. The reason for these racial preferences is administrators' burning desire to engineer a campus with a "critical mass" of black and Hispanic face.
...
From 1996 to 2015, the average difference between the mean black score on the math SAT and the mean white score was 0.92 standard deviation, reports a February 2017 Brookings Institution study. The average black score on the math SAT was 428 in 2015; the average white score was 534, and the average Asian score was 598. The racial gaps were particularly great at the tails of the distribution. Among top scorers - those scoring between 750 and 800 - 60 percent were Asian, 33 percent were white, and 2 percent were black. At the lowest end - scores between 300 and 350 - 6 percent were Asian, 21 percent were white, and 35 percent were black. If the SATs were redesigned to increase score variance - that is, to spread out the scores across a greater range by adding more hard questions and more easy questions - the racial gaps would widen.
The usual poverty explanations for the SAT gap don't hold up. In 1997, white students from households with incomes of $10,000 or less scored better than black students from households with incomes of $80,000 to $100,000. In 2015, students with family incomes of $0 to $20,000 (a category that includes all racial groups) had a higher average math score (455) than the average math SAT score of black students from all income levels (435). At the University of California, race predicts SAT scores better than class. Proponents of racial preferences routinely claim that the SATs are culturally biased and do not measure actual cognitive skills. If that were the case, blacks would do better in college than their SAT scores would predict. As discussed in chapter 2, blacks do worse. Further, the math test is not amendable to the "cultural-bias" criticism (unless one believes that math is itself biased). Low scores reflect an actual difficulty with math. In 2016, 54 percent of black elementary and high school students in California, for example, did not meet the state's math standards, compared with 21 percent of white students and 11 percent of Asian students. The chancellor of the California Community Colleges system proposed in July 2017 that intermediate algebra be removed from graduation requirements for associate's degrees because blacks and Hispanics have such a hard time passing the course. Math difficulties are the greatest reason that, in California, only 35 percent of black students earn their associate's degrees, compared with 54 percent of whites and 65 percent of Asians. (The Diversity Delusion)
White and Bright
A new Georgetown U. study reveals that if the student bodies of the 200 most selective American colleges were enrolled solely on objective SAT/ACT test scores, their student bodies would increase from 66% white to 75% white.
Thanks for breaking the silence. As a professor who actually teaches football players at a football powerhouse, I can’t tell you how sick I am of coaches emailing to press their woke Marxism on me. They practically write my exams now, Marxism is that important to them.
WHITES SHOULD START CREATING WHITE ONLY ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS WHERE NO SPORTS ARE PLAYED AND ADMITTANCE IS SOLELY BASED ON TEST SCORES (SAT AND ACT).
Like Most Nigger Collegiate Athletes, Kawhi Had No Interest In Academic Matters And No Intention Of Becoming The Scholar Athlete That These Institutions Of Higher Learning Purport Them To Be. Rather, He Was Just A Nigger That Came To Campus To Playball Like Most Other Collegiate Niggers! That's Why His Only Concern Was The B-ball Court And Why He Headed Directly To The B-ball Court Upon Arriving To Campus!
A Belief Expressed By More NIGGER Collegiate Athletes Than Many Fans Would Believe!
A Social And Economic Niche (Basketball) Was Created In Our Cultural Environment 130 Years Ago That Demanded Certain Psychological And Physical Traits! The Traits, Specifically The Physical Traits That This Niche Demanded (High Athleticism, Aggression, And Impulsiveness) Were Right Up The Black Man's Alley (The EXACT Traits That The Black Man Genetically Evolved In Africa). Imagine If Basketball Or Football Or Rap* Or R&B Didn't Exist. How Would Blacks Get Their Genes Into The Next Generation In The U.S.? What Occupations Would Allow Them To Pass Their Genes Onto The Next Generation?! Science? Technology? Education? Math? (ACADEMIA?) LOL!
Por Ejemplo, If Rap Didn't Exist How Would An UGLY NIGGER Like This Attain The Wealth And Status To Attract High Quality Mates To Procreate With? To Put It Differently, Considering His Level Of Intelligence, Level Of Education, Socioeconomic Background, Level Of Attractiveness, Etc., What Line Of Work (Field Or Industry) Would Provide Him The Opportunities To Amass Wealth And Women (The Wealth And Women He Currently Has)? Science? Academia? Technology? The Legal Field? The Medical Field?
RAP IS JUST BLACK, UNDERCLASS CULTURE WRIT LARGE! IT'S JUST THE NIGGER WORLD (r-SELECTED**NIGGER CULTURE ) ON A GRANDER SCALE (THE NIGGER WORLD WITH MORE MONEY, POWER, AND INFLUENCE). (EVOLUTION HAS NO DIRECTION***. IT CAN LEAD TO CULTURAL TRAITS (NICHES) THAT BENEFIT A SOCIETY OR CULTURAL TRAITS (NICHES) THAT HARM A SOCIETY. WHY? BECAUSE AS LONG AS A CULTURAL TRAIT CAN BE USED TO PASS ON ONE'S GENES (AS LONG AS BASKETBALL OR FOOTBALL OR RAP ALLOW ONE TO PASS ON ONE'S GENES) THAT CULTURAL TRAIT WILL PERSIST! DO YOU UNDERSTANDS ME? HERE'S AN EXAMPLE IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTANDS ME! A SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC NICHE WAS FILLED IN IRELAND BY A SUBSET OF THE IRISH POPULATION THAT WAS GENETICALLY INCLINED TO FILL THAT NICHEhttps://twitter.com/gtredoux/status/1480334058290917385
The Above Tweet And Article (A Black Randomly Murdered By Another Black) Encapsulates The Hypocrisy And Logical Inconsistency Of The Black Lives Matter Movement!
STAN, LOOK AT WHAT YOU WHITE LIBERALS CREATED (NIGGERS LIKE THAT BELOW AND HIS COHORTS AND BLACK GANG CULTURE)! STAN, WHAT DID YOU SAY DURING TODAY'S (04/18/22)GSW v. DN GAME? "THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT...EXACTLY". YES, EXACTLY! EVERYTHING I'M WRITING IS EXACTLY WHAT YOU WERE THINKING! I CAN READ MINDS STAN BECAUSE I HAVE HIGH T.O.M. (THEORY OF MIND) ABILITY!
WHAT HAPPENS WHEN SOCIETY IS LIBERALIZED AS IT WAS IN THE UNITED STATES IN THE 1960s DUE TO THE CIVIL RIGHTS MOVEMENT AND SEXUAL REVOLUTION? SOCIETY BECOMES r-SELECTED AND THE LOW IQ, CRIMINALLY INCLINED ARE ALLOWED TO BREED FREELY AND ATTAIN STATUS IN SOCIETY LEADING TO NIGGERS LIKE THE ONE ABOVE BEING BORN AND SUBCULTURES (GANG SUBCULTURE) LIKE THE ONE HE COMES FROM BEING CREATED AND FLOURISHING (READ THE PASSAGES I'VE PHOTOGRAPHED FROM THIS BOOK:
https://www.amazon.com/Evolutionary-Psychology-Behind-Politics-Conservatism/dp/0982947933). (I'll Rewrite This So That You Idiots Can Fully Grasp It! But This Is The Point - The Liberal White Man Has No One To Blame Other Than Himself When He Sees The Black Man Killing His White Sons, Raping His White Daughters, And Polluting, Pillaging, And Pulverizing His White Communities Because It Is He Who Has Created The Cultural Milieu That's Allowed The Black Man To Do So!)
The year before George Floyd's death, black youths age 15-19 were 19 times more like than white youths to die by gun homicide. In 2021, during the Black Lives Matter Racial Reckoning, black youths were now 27 times more likely to die by gunshot.
Heckuva job, BLM!
Hispanic youths (age 15-19) died by gun homicides 48% more in 2021 during the depolicing era than they did in 2019. The triumph of BLM's anti-police campaign in 2020 was a catastrophe for black and Hispanic youths who died much more in 2021 than in 2019.
Once The White Man Took His Foot Off Of The Black Man's Neck (Relinquished His Power And Authority Over Him In America) The Black Man Was Free To Do As He Pleased, i.e. No Longer Conform To The White Man's Norms And Mores (Speak Like The White Man, Abide The Law Like The White Man, Become Educated Like The White Man, Become Industrious Like TheWhite Man, Become Docile Like The White Man, Become A Family Man Like The White Man(Form Stable Family Units Like The White Man), Become Civilized Like The White Man, Etc.). This Transformation Occurred In The 1960s And It Allowed The Black Man To Revert To His Default Nature. What's The Black Man's Default Nature? The Nature Of A NIGGER! The Genetic Nature His African Ancestor's Evolved In Africa - A Nature That's More Physically Inclined Than Mentally Inclined, A Nature That's More Unscrupulous And Mendacious Than Scrupulous And Veracious, A Nature That's More Hostile And Volatile Than Agreeable And Peaceable. And What Does This Nature Result In In A Civilized Society (A Society With A Sophisticated Justice System Like In America). It Results In A Lot Of NIGGERs Committing Crimes And Being Committed To Mental/Correctional Institutions!
Even when adjusted for their parents' level of affluence, black men are four times more likely to be incarcerated than white men raised at the same level of affluence, with the ratio rising to 10 to 1 for those from the richest One Percent.
That's nuts.)
Compare this ratio in the Black community of 78 men to every 100 women to China, where commentators have made much of how the gender imbalance could impact social dynamics- In China, there are 105.07 males for every 100 females.
Much Of The Turmoil In The Black* Community Stems From This Fact: Sex Ratio Imbalance. If Males Outnumber Females In A Population They're Less Likely To Commit To Them (Develop A Monogamous Relationship), Less Likely To Create And Maintain A Family With Them, And More Likely To Place More Emphasis On Mating Than Parenting (Mating Which Includes Courting Which Includes Committing Criminal Acts To Attract Mates). - Peter Dagampat Ph.D.
"many universities are now female-biased at the undergraduate level..sex ratio is related to mating patterns. A surplus of women in the mating pool tends to shift mating behavior more toward short-term mating, such as 'hookups' and 'friends with benefits'"
"ratio of men to women in a given ecology can have profound influences on a range of interpersonal processes, from marriage and divorce rates to risk-taking and violent crime" https://sciencedirect.com/science/articl
"Unequal sex ratios are associated with increased competition and risky behaviors amongst individuals of the more prevalent sex, and a general shift towards the relationship preferences of the scarcer sex" https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X19300582
The human sex ratio, the changing proportion of males to females in a population. has grave consequences for sexual mores and the coexistence of men and women. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-17976-001
The Reverse Holds True For This Finding As Well (an abundance of Black women compared to Black men - leads to lower marriage rates, more divorces, greater infertility, women choosing lower quality mates and being unhappier in their marriages).https://twitter.com/degenrolf/status/1302971343273693188 Unhappy (Angry) Sista!
The human sex ratio, the changing proportion of males to females in a population. has grave consequences for sexual mores and the coexistence of men and women. http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2018-17976-001
...females shifting towards greater short-term mating orientations under female-biased sex ratios...Female-biased sex ratios, on the other hand, lead women to be more career-driven, with such a shift ostensibly occurring because of the greater difficulty females face in finding a long-term investing partner when men are scare.
*So How Should The Black Community Solve Their Social Problems, Particularly Their Crime Problem? By Reducing The Black Female Population (Eliminating Many Of The Genetically Defective Black Females To Make Their Numbers More Equal To The Black Male Population) And Imposing Severe Restrictions On The Sexuality Of Those Remaining Black Females Through The Use Of Hijabs, Jilbabs, Chastity Belts, Foot Binding, Clitorectomies, Etc.
If Brothas Like Us Want The Black Crime Rate To Decrease We're Going To Need To See Moe Sistas Dressed Like This!
Results are consistent with the hypothesis that similar to males in many species, men tactically regulate their investments to adapt to the fluctuation in the adult sex ratio in order to maximize their probabilities of attracting a mate Population-wide studies have provided evidence that male-biased adult sex ratios allow women to exert greater bargaining power, which often means exerting greater pressure for monogamy. n a study across 66 relatively developed nations worldwide, the more male-biased a nation’s adult sex ratio of 15–49 year olds, the lower the country’s divorce rate.”
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
